Yes but it was a press conference being held by Manchester United. If they say they are not taking questions on a certain topic then that's up to them. It's not uncommon alot of teams state prior to a press conference starting if they don't want questions on a certain topic. So no SAF doesn't have to take questions on it, he's a football manager not a editor of heat magazine. The club will support him as most clubs always do in private matters as for the club it performance on the pitch not in the bedroom that matters. When players of other clubs have done things in the past they usually do get the support of the club. You can question the man, each to their own, but I don't think you can question his managerial achievements.
He's a good manager but there is times when he can be both childish and petty.What he did on PNE was nothing short of disgraceful.Taking back two players that were on loan just because they sacked his son.If his son was a good manager,he wouldn't have been sacked in the first place.His boycott of the BBC is just as petty.Does he realise that all agents are crooked,and it doesn't mean one isn't just because their last name is Ferguson. Nobody is questioning his achievements as a manager,but its more the point that he is petty and childish and an intolerable bully. Secondly one manager doesn't create a dynasty.Liverpool had that dynasty from 1959-1991.Shanks to Bob,Bob to Joe,Joe to Kenny.Seemless hand-overs.United are going to go the same way they did when Busby left in 1969.Okay they may not crash and burn like they did that time,but they aren't going to enjoy the same level of success after Ferguson goes.I reckon once Ferguson goes,they will have at least two managers in the space of five years.Ferguson hasn't groomed a successor,nobody has served an apprenticeship.And you can't include Mike ''Nodding Dog'' Phelan,as he's Uniteds answer to Sammy Lee.Nice bloke but not in a million years managerial material.
No you haven't, you have posted the same ****e a few times and rightly been laughed at for your lack of knowledge.
He still won't admit that Borussia Moechengladbach were a top side,even though they contained half the German World Cup winning team of 1974.And the soon to be crowned European Footballer of the Year Denmark International Allan Simonsen. Then again most United fans claim Kenny Dalglish cannot be up with the ''greats'' because he was never European Footballer of the year.Kevin Keegan won it twice and Kenny and Keegan said this himself was ''10 times better'' than him.George Best said ''Kenny Dalglish is up with Alfredo De Stefano''.Even Baconface admired his competitive streak and called him a born winner and as ''brave as a lion''.
Yep, I made my point, was a valid and decent point, In no way made out the EC was easy or less of an achievement. Just simply pointed out it was easier than the CL due to the level of competition. and KPR, they were a great team, but when they were in it, Bayern werent and tbh, Bayern were, are and alway will be a greater team than Munchingladrags or whatever they are called lol.
Yes, but typical of the early teenage child that he is, U19R does not like it when people prove him wrong and is firmly in the belief that if you say something often enough people will believe you.
Funny you should talk about Monchengladbach in that manner given they are Germany's answer to Man U in European competituon.
Yep bayern were great then, just that borussia were better hence them stopping bayern winning the league for (I think) the three years previous to that 77 final.
I suspect U1R knows nothing about Bayern or Munchen. So his points are pointless and his statements turned to fertiliser
