http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/409946/Final-predicted-Premier-League-table Someone has worked out the final league table. They predict that Burnley will only score 8 goals all season and Villa only 6! The only good thing is that they predict we will stay up!
What a cracking formula these people must be brilliant as Villa have already scored 5 and Burnley 6 There are 27 matches left? based on that put your life savings on these fixtures and combo's: Sat 29th Nov Burnley V Villa as the scores can only be 0-0 0-1 2-1 2-0 1-1 or 1-0 The match on the closing day of the season Villa v Burnley looks a dead cert 0-0 … it could be the most depressing area of the UK on that day
With a +53 Goal difference.....the best defence in the division with only 11 goals conceded over 38 games. Us on the other hand.....Worst defence in the division with 62 goals against. The Villa and Burnely 'Goals For' columns are hilarious
Far too much, injuries to one or two key players for any team would have a dramatic impact. Completely pointless exercise in anal gazing !!
Going on the results so far, they've tried to predict the way the rest of the results will go which ultimately leads to the league positions being almost identical to the way they are now.
Their biggest error is that they've enacted de Moivre's theorem using a constant 'c, but without taking into account the co-efficient of restitution 'z' as it tends towards zero. If you apply the logarithmic value of the lowest common denominator 'x', but factor in the exponential of the number you first thought of, and plot this on a graph for a range of variables between zero and 'n', where 'n' is the point where the cosine of 'z' demonstrates negative correlation with the tangent of 'c', you get quite different answers. Just saying.
You need to stay on the medication Uber...had me worried for a minute that you were some genius mathematician????
I think you have forgotten the binomial theorum in that differentiation mate. B- Must try harder and listen in class
I always start the day off with a hard one, Dave. Hmmmm...let's see.... Seven plus twelve... ...So, that's two plus the seven... ...which is nine... ...carry the one.... ...less the number you first thought of... ...not forgetting to deduct the variable 'c'... ...and the variant CJD... ...multiply by the co-efficient of the Bernstein-Eagleberger Theorem.... ...Damn! I nearly forgot to invoke the Reverse Polarity Loop multiple (schoolboy error)... ...Is it Mornington Crescent?
