Mafia 4

As a town can we help those potentially being leaned on? If we state "Not coerced" when we vote then those alleging to have been coerced can just vote without saying so directly

Could get messy if not all townies on board like

My vote WAS NOT coerced

 

Fair enough, I accept that but I'm not trying to change votes from me. In happy for Sky to chose me

Change your vote to me now then. You're not going to surprise me as I'm expecting it. However you will be ****ting on your follow townies as not only will you be taking the decision out of their hands but also killing one of their members

Why me? This is exactly what I was getting at. Anyone that speaks is ****ed

Edit: never mind. Realised why since

Yep how dare I suggest going along with whatever the only known innocent suggests lol

 

Not sure I should say this since people are associating me with Valley but...

Valley is a new player and maybe doesn't realise the consequences of his actions???

 

Just pointing it out. You're hardly going to say "I'm mafia! Vote for someone else!"*

*Maybe if you're Magic or RHC.

 

Look at what BRB did though last game

 

Like it.

My vote WAS NOT coerced

 

I'm starting to get the feeling I really should have read the last game. Anyone mind briefly describing what happened?

 

Surely now if we just pile on IBWT and/or Valley we'll get 50% chance of a mafia If not we'll know the other one for tomorrow Is their a scenario they're both being coerced? Surely not...so one of them's lying.

 

True, he's probably going to do it again too. Guarantee he votes for me

 

His answer of "The silence is deafening" would appear to at least indicate that there is some sort of reason for him not saying. It doesn't sound like he's just being obtuse.

 

My vote WAS NOT coerced

 

My vote WAS NOT coerced.

 

No keep it a 3 way vote minimum

And no my vote was no coerced it was a random selection and I'm willing to change it but we will see valley's vote put Lucaas on 3 and immediately it was reversed and we are supposedly looking for just that

 

A very reasonable suggestion! My Vote Was Not Coerced!

Potentially associating you. If he is Mafia he could equally have been changing a vote because one or more OTHER people with two votes were Mafia and protecting them. (it could also be that Mafia chose him to change because you were Mafia).

If Valley is guilty (or innocent) it doesn't mean you are (or aren't) - but it does look a little bad for you!

That was my thought too... and he stuck around a while (saw him on the "now reading" for some time afterwards) which suggests he could have given an explanation but didn't.

 

Billy - Not coerced
Gerrez - Not coerced
Lucaaas - Not coerced
Nozzer - Not coerced
MITO - Not coerced
Milk - Not coerced

#mighthelp

#whoknows

 

Valley still showing up as "Now Reading"... has had opportunity to state "not coerced".

So I'm going to say one of the following is true:

a) IBWT was lying
b) Valley is lying
c) They are both lying
d) There is more than one way that votes are being coerced.

Of those, I think d is least likely- so Valley or IBWT are probably guilty. (maybe both)

 

i think associating people is fine but extending it to if one is innocent the othe ris or vice versa is dangerous.

I think valley has to be suspected for the move but the question must be do WE as town let this take us to a place where the whole day vanishes in a cloud of everyone piling on valley and we lose the tie up....

I don't know the answer to that.

 

I think basically both can be suspects but i don't want to see jsut them in a 2 way. Lets get another still up there.

 

No but the least we should do is ensure both are in any potential tie.....one appears guilty if not both so we have to have both in the vote surely

 

I've just got to go with BRB