If I knew you personally and I knew you were really not racist at all I would perhaps take what you said as a joke or a wind up. However...(You knew that was coming did'nt you?) I don't know you from Adam and whenever I read one of your posts it tends to be about Asians this, Pakis that, etc. That sadly leads me to conclude that you are not trying to be humoruous but have set out to offend people, you do realise that there are thousands of people on this forum and some of them are probably not white? Do you think they think you are funny or not a racist?
At least Huth is honest about it. Not like ****s like Loiner who see a debate on racism who jumps in and tries to defend the racists.
Foreign people is all people not from the UK. The collected mass of non-Brits does not qualify as a race even if there is some definition which says nationality has some part to play in the definition of a race (which by the way it does not). I wasn't justifying or rationalizing it in any form, I maintained it was a non-racist, ignorant, throwaway wind-up comment and still maintain that people being outraged at its 'racism' is a) inaccurate and b) pointless, indeed self-defeating.
yeah its called stereotyping. and the use of the word 'paki's' is the same as using the word '******' in a racist context. You chose to say 'paki's' rather than pakistani or asian your comment is worse than Huth's
What, you use a taxi service ran by Pakistanis so that means you do not dislike them? To be honest I couldn't care what a guy from Stoke thinks about any group of people, my point was that so many people go out of their way on a forum to get offended by some arse bandit with a handfull of words in his vocabulary. ****stain.
Why, because you say so? It does'nt work that way i'm afraid. People cannot control outrage, it's like anger and laughter, it's a natural instinct which should not be curbed just because you and others don't happen to think some people have any right to express an opinion or their feelings on a subject. Next thing you'll be telling me I have no right to be sad if I see a starving child in AFrica.
another post said tongue in cheek, are you people that ****ing thick yourselves, that you cant see the wood for the trees.
handfull of words, means to me that i only can speak 5 words then? i suppose this sentence, blows that rumour out of the water
Ahh so the ditionary definitions are to be ignored in favour of what you say? Swearing at a french/German/ chinese person based on their nationality is not racist? or not employing them? The comment may well have been 'throwaway' (although some comments indicate this is the norm for Huth which you conveniently ignore). I think people were not as 'outraged' at huth as some think, it was banter in some instances. It seems that you sre the one that people seem to be 'outraged' with And the irony is Huth's comments would not have reached this far in terms of comments, which is what you think woudl have happened on ignoring him, if people were not arguing th epoints raised by you
You do know you used it too, right? Earlier in the thread, not simply as quote like you did here. Moron.
