Banksy, I just noticed we had the biggest away following in the 3 football leagues and below, that must mean something to our NON - LEAGUE newcomers..
interesting little dig at the end wiz. so far in this thread it has been explained a fair few times that its not a dig at city. some comments we made actually was good compliments towards city. somehow though this has been miss read and been accused of having a dig at city so in return they give digs back. i hold my hands up. im confused about what is going on. both sides doing well. cant we just get along? anyway, i wash my hands with this weirdness. goodnight irene and goodnight to all
Rovers: Barnet.................. 663 Altrincham ........... 376 FGR... .................. 1886 Braintree ............ 565 Lincoln ................ 211 Southport ........... 367 Eastleigh............. 996 Aldershot............ 1255 Dorchester.......... 1100 = averaging 824 travelling gasheads. City: Sheff. Utd............ 665 Rochdale............. 791 Notts Co.............. 918 Port Vale............. 421 Fleetwood........... 885 Walsall................ 1979 Cheltenham........ 880 Coventry............. 3794 Barnsley.............. 661 = averaging 1221 travelling reds. So no change, City still taking more than Rovers to away games. Rovers fans doing their club proud taking that high figure away from home to watch non league football. The average figure has actually rised since the start of this thread. Well done to those travelling gasheads. Considering what league we are in and what misery it has been over the last several years on the road, and the fact that we aint in the play off places! City fans at last doing their club proud. Although the figure was more than Rovers when this thread was made, being top of League 1 and running away with it, I expected the average attendance for City to be much higher. But recent games on the road for City fans have been fantastic for sure and has boosted the average figure to where it should be for the top club in league 1. Anything else ROD?
