A quick public peck on the lips of your armadillo is ok. Shagging an armadillo is another matter entirely. Which reminds me how disgusting it is to see people 'kissing' their dogs. Letting the dog lap away at their mouth with a tongue that was previously cleaning it's baws and/or arsehole. Gies me the boak.
I disagree, things can be more valid than other things. It isn't like "unique" where something can't be very unique, it is either unique or it isn't.
Have to agree about the dog kissing thing. In my upbringing dogs were strictly downstairs critters, and never allowed upstairs or in bedrooms. Still can't understand how anyone can let a dog sleep on their bed. Smelly flea-ridden creatures who eat their own and others faeces. Disgusting. But I still love them because they're man's best friend.
I disagree. Valid or invalid. You can't have more invalid. You can't have more valid. Something is valid until it's proven invalid, or vice versa.
Eh? You're making this **** up. In any given context something is valid or invalid. There are no grey areas to which you can apply more or less.
I went into a pub and a dog was lying licking his balls. I said to his owner "I wish I could do that" and he replied "If you give him a biscuit he will probably let you".
I agree. If I say the reason I hate Liverpool FC is that it's the epitome of self pity it's a valid point. If Gambol then says he hates Liverpool FC because it has a lot of very unpleasant fans it's another valid point. There's no difference in the level of validity of the arguments put forward. They are equally valid.
If however, we were speaking about how scousers are thieving bastards and you said, yes, they stole my wallet last week when we played the in the cup, that would be a valid point, if then somebody mentioned they were stealing wallets from fellow fans who lay dead on the pitch at Hillsborough, that would be more of a valid point because it is more extreme, hence a very ****ing valid point, you pair of ****ers!
