We are doing fine dont worry about it. we are a mid table team and thats where we will finish. If we had finishers then we would be in the top 5....no problem here except finishing...
Whose fault is it that we are capable of competing for 90 minutes because of a drop in tempo and work rate.
"It's not monks fault bony and co cannot finish is it." So how many chances did Bony miss then? The most glaring misses were Ki (twice) and Siggy. I take it they are the 'co'? But don't let the facts get in the way of your agenda, right?
Who were those games against? 11 - 3 top 6 teams 12 - 1 top 6 teams 13 - 4 top 6 teams 14 - 1 top 6 teams (2if Man U are included)
What were the injuries during each 8game run, Over what period of time were the 8 games played in, what was the season game load , incuding all cup games, during which the 8games was part off..
Such a lunatic post. According to you,Laudrup was a "crap manager".The man who managed to establish the team into the TOP HALF of the P.L. Yet you now maintain that mid table is acceptable under Monk. You make no mention of Cup's,and the possibility of perhaps winning one. You know,kind of emulating Laudrup's achievement. Presumably,if the team fail to win a Cup,that will be another rollicking success as far as you are concerned. So,to sum up,if Laudrup is a "crap" Manager,then we will need to find a new word to describe Monk if the best he can do is mid table,and no Cup. "If we had finishers then we would be in the top 5". Well,if I'd won the Lottery last week,I'd now be far richer. "No problem here except finishing". Well,come the end of the season,it may just become apparent that we have a "crap" Manager. "No problem" then. But,hey,"no problem",you can always come out and say that you never wanted Monk in the first place. You could jump ship early,just like your Penclawdd neighbour has ALREADY done. Better be quick though,since the lifeboats will fill up pretty quickly.
Finishing in the top half of the P.L. and winning the Capital One Cup is being "contentious"? Bring on contention,I say. Perhaps Monk is learning though. Calling player's "cheats" is pretty "contentious" wouldn't you say? Hassle? What hassle? Monk was a cheap alternative to the likes of Koeman. Koeman is showing his class. Monk is showing...,well,he's not showing anything much at the moment. He'll soon be asked to show some money in the not too distant future,however,via the inevitable fine that will be imposed on him. But you never really wanted Monk anyway.