I understand were you are coming from but as you say these organisations have gained credibility, to me CTWD will find it hard to gain crediblity unless it starts to engage with the all pass holder's if not it will always be seen as a protest group
I'm following the idea of a supporters trust group very closely,and my thoughts on that will go public, in good time. I'll consider the pros and cons and i'll talk to Hull city fans,before i make any big noises. As things stand,CTWD along with all the other anti name change fans,have done me proud. Why would i doubt them now ? You however will press on with your faux Paxman impression ad nauseam. You are obviously contrary, to ocd levels,and that is why i'm now giving myself a mental slap on the head, for even trying to debate with you.
You started a reply to a preivous post of mine but it was about 2 words long and ended with 'you've'. Passholders don't matter now. It is about people who attend games. Then it is about the people of Hull who don't want Mr Allam to be given one of their assests so he builds a swimming pol he alone profits from on the Walton Street carpark - with no thought given to the likes of Albert Ave pools literally a stones throw away. And who says he can build their anyway given the cash that it is clear the council must get off the fair people.
Why is asking questions and expressing opinion to a group professing to represent me contrary? Surely mutely agreeing is the contrary position in a democratic process?
He is raising valid issues that he would like to be answered properly what's the problem with that ,or don't you like people asking direct questions.
Welcome to my world. So as the elephant in the room is being ignored, can we have a general questions for CTWD thread so we can try and get an official response to the chairman of ctwd thinking our clubs chairman is a ****?
Thanks for that, For me, after seeing the CTWD presentation to the FA and all the subsequent official press releases they have gained a huge amount of credibility. Thats a first step on a long road, the next step seems to be the resurection/merger of the old dormant supporters trust. Engagement is a two way thing and it looks like CTWD are trying.
I was pointing out that the Authorities don't rely on the larger groups, an individual with a valid point can be far more powerful. This is yours not mine. I fully understand and appreciate willing volunteers getting together to work for the benefit of those who can't be arsed. Thank you CTWD good luck with the trust
I was replying to this originally, where you say that the authorities turn to large organisations rather than listening to individuals. http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/280980-CTWD-publishes-its-draft-vision-aims-and-objectives?p=7203423&viewfull=1#post7203423
Was you arsed? perhaps the people you say can't be arsed are just simply happy with the way the club is under Allam.
It doesnt work like that. You see that the ones suffering most from famine, for example, actually don't have the resources to move so they don't. The poorest in our society don't protest because protest is a luxury afforded those that have the time and nothing better to think about. Most people in Hull don't protest Allam's ownership not becaus ethey don't care, but because they don't have the energy to do that on top of everything else. Lets look at the pro allam protests - 20 seconds of booing never to be heard again - and compare that to the ctwd chants, compare them and take that as a reasonable indicator of the feeling of the people of Hull.
