100% this. Football how it should be played. Non of this tippy tappy s**t, then falling down like you've been shot by a sniper.
Like others on here I think it was exaggerated. It was probably a foul but a soft one to give imo. Diame has to almost put his hand on him as Flamini tries to cut him off and when you just compare their sizes, it's almost impossible for diame not to uphend him. Flamini is such a scrawny little **** anyways. And if you look carefully, all he did was unbalance him, flamini then tried to pass it to the arsenal defender next to him and Diame's long legs intercepted it. Flamini should blame all the diving ****s that have played for Arsenal and tarnished the game by diving. He didn't go down like them and that's probably why the ref didn't blow.
It was a soft foul. How can you call it clear when a professional referee couldn't even come to that conclusion? The fact alone that Flamini stays on his feet for once (unlike his teammates) made the foul a lot less clear to see.
What a load of ****e. 'Everyone???? who exactly? The bloke with the whistle and the one with the flag didn't think so. We were not given anything, the goal was scored, not given to us. Instead of looking to pick our players to pieces concentrate on that diving cheating little bastard, Wiltshire. There's plenty to go at there. Also if I or anyone 'went mental' every time there was the minimal contact between players tussling for the ball ( Diame was outnumbered three to one, and still won) we would be sat there in straight jackets with a nurse holding our hand. FFS.
The only thing embarrassing on here pal is you and your pathetically negative posts. It was a great finish and piss poor defending. Play to the whistle, it happens every week on every football pitch in the country.
We're swimming against the tide mate, i bet some on here politely applaud the opposition when they come to take a corner kick too.
There's nothing positive about denying what happened or trying desperately to justify it. Have your opinion, sure, but if that's really how you saw it then don't come on here winging next time a decision goes against us.
Who really gives a ****? We're on the wrong end of these decisions far more than we benefit from them. We've had the unpunished Nasri stamp, the unpunished Fabregas gob and we had to contend with Wilshere and Sanchez diving yesterday, don't make excesses for the cheating twats ffs, they deserve everything they get. Fortunately, the best punishment they can get is Wenger remaining in charge.
By saying that you imply, to me, you know it was a foul but its ok cos its us. Again. No one is complaining about us getting the decision but the ref got it wrong. I couldnt give a **** if arsenal were winning 10-0 with Wilshere diving for 16 penalties if Diame did that and i was asked was Flamini fouled i'd say yes he was. Great finish by diame. Play to the whistle.
I don't know it was a foul, 50/50 and the ref said no i'll go with that. On the other hand if a 50/50 goes against us i might have cause to complain on a football forum. Its a game, us versus them in which i want us to win of course. I can't believe that 1 or 2 of us on here are having defend our decision of acepting the refferee's .
Show me a link to the last time I whinged at a decision going against us......................and I don't have to 'desperately justify' anything, the man controlling the game didn't see it as a foul, and he is the one that matters. Didn't they mention on radio the callous 'foul' on Dawson in the last ten minutes which put him out of the game? I saw it clearly from my seat behind the goal, the referee didn't, but that's football, you win some you lose some. Its just a shame a Hull City fans forum has posters picking to pieces our own teams performance. I wonder how many posts there are on the Arsenal board debating if the 'foul' that wasn't given on Dawson should have been a sending off offence? I thought it was, but I'm not the referee. I'm just a supporter who supports the team.
If you're likening yourself to an Arsenal fan then you've lost the arguement. We're better than that.
