1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Diame's goal today.

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Cityswall, Oct 18, 2014.

  1. GLP

    GLP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    30,202
    Likes Received:
    28,508
    ****it Flamini plays for Arsenal. Flamini was definitely obstructing Diame ;)
     
    #21
  2. Edelman

    Edelman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    19,912
    Likes Received:
    9,221
    Who cares
     
    #22
  3. Davies Headband

    Davies Headband Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    161
    It's a foul, but I'm not complaining about it - as others have said we've had enough bad luck against us this season to earn that one.
     
    #23
  4. tigerpants54

    tigerpants54 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    49
    How anyone can call it an outright foul is beyond me! flamini, seems to go in for the tackle with his back to diame, which is obstruction. The only thing diame can do is go down himself and risk not getting a foul or just getting a free kick. Flamini put his body in their to obstruct Diame, which in itself is a foul, so diame grabbed him to counter balance the decision, I.E 50/50, play on. Flamini's biggest mistake was to stop playing and asking for the foul, this maybe swayed the decision even more in our favour.
     
    #24
  5. Edelman

    Edelman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    19,912
    Likes Received:
    9,221
    It is a foul but in a way I'm glad it led to a goal.
    Iff it was Sachez on Davies That prick Wenger wouldn't have seen it
    All the better I think
     
    #25
  6. ellewoods

    ellewoods Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Messages:
    10,649
    Likes Received:
    1,178
    Its only a foul if it happens against us. <ok>
     
    #26
  7. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,305
    Likes Received:
    18,730
    It was a foul but I agree with Cityswall's point. Flamini was doing the boring obstructing thing and Diame just said **** it I'm coming through. Defenders facing their own goal normally get way too much protection and can just buy a cheap free kick to get out of trouble. Flamini thought he could do that and then when he was fouled he just assumed he'd got a free kick and gave up.
     
    #27
  8. HorshamTiger2

    HorshamTiger2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    2
    Great foul!

    Very surprised that an Arsenal player didn't dive when touched.....
     
    #28
  9. Pat E O'Dors

    Pat E O'Dors Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    870
    How often do we see defenders obstructing attackers when letting the ball run out for a goal kick and the refs give nothing?
     
    #29
  10. WhittlingStick

    WhittlingStick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,781
    Likes Received:
    502
    Diame was a very sof type of foul and a few moments earlier he had one not given on himself .
    Provided you dont grab and pull the shirt or literally pull the man down i dont really see a problem with this type of tussle .
    As i said before , Keepers can lead with their knees into a clearance , can punch through a busy pen box but are protected from physical players who arn't bowled over so easy .
     
    #30

  11. AmalCarb

    AmalCarb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2014
    Messages:
    941
    Likes Received:
    505
    Reminded me of a bygone era.
     
    #31
  12. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    124,862
    Likes Received:
    72,901
    Definitely a foul. Diame grabbed his shirt pulled him back, then put his arm across his neck. You got lucky with that decision.

    But we defended poorly. Mertesacker was appealing for a foul instead of trying to tackle Diame <doh>
     
    #32
  13. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,023
    So you don't think Diame was obstructed ?
     
    #33
  14. GCTiger

    GCTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,486
    Likes Received:
    272
    From an arsenal board... A snip at £3.5m


    Caz19 wrote:
    What's discouraging is that we're dominating games and drawing...I'd much rather have 2012-13 performances where we were playing mediocre but winning...


    Having lots of the ball yes, dominating no. Their keeper had a maximum of 3 saves to make. Southampton beat Sunderland 8-0 today with 53% ball possession whereas we have averaged 60% + this season against some very good teams. We are passing the ball incessantly and dribbling around in circles but that's because these teams are allowing us to do so knowing we'll eventually look to try and play a ball through the eye of the needle in the centre.

    Dominanting is what Diame did to midfield today. He was a monster. It's like he was so sure he'd win the ball that he watched whoever it was coming towards him, stood his ground and said "thank you very much I'll have the ball now". Domination has a physical aspect too. Every ball we put in the air bar one or two was won by Hull. We missed Chambers I felt.

    Every 50/50 where we dipped a toe or dangled a foot, they put chest, shoulder and back into making sure they won that ball. We lack serious power in the middle and it got shown up today. I'm not talking about a team of 6ft beasts, but players who proactively put their body between man and ball. People like Nigel de Jong and Javier Mascherano aren't giants but try and brush them off the ball.
     
    #34
  15. Cityswall

    Cityswall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    163
    He clearly didn't see the pull back before the obstruction as well.
     
    #35
  16. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,119
    Likes Received:
    77,511
    There were a hell of a lot of soft free kicks yesterday, particularly against Huddlestone who was getting frustrated at how many times he was penalised after perfectly good tackles(though he was correctly penalised for some clumsy one's).
     
    #36
  17. tigerpants54

    tigerpants54 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    49
    Arsenal are always wanting free kicks, and when they don't get one they make a big fuss!.....Diame maybe did put his hands on fannylini but he should of stood his ground, the fact he started jumping about like a netball player, will not of done him any favours!
     
    #37
  18. balkan tiger

    balkan tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    14,876
    Likes Received:
    12,972
    Foul or not i don't care, the ref gave it and thats good enough for me. Much more pleasing to see was someone driving forward and going for goal. There were 4 defenders around him, it would have been much easier to fall over looking for a free kick just outside the box which seems to be the standard plan of many forwards these days.
     
    #38
  19. WhittlingStick

    WhittlingStick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,781
    Likes Received:
    502
    I always think Arsenal dick about too much when they have possession , the team has so much pace in it and a little lightweight but they insist in fart arsing about when a more boring option is much better .
     
    #39
  20. tigercity

    tigercity Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    7,491
    Likes Received:
    1,185
    I have sympathy and I've texted Wenger to say sorry that our team didn't let them have 3 points. Teams like Hull shouldn't get in the way of the big boys, it simply isn't fair and would never happen in France
     
    #40

Share This Page