http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-13-killed-falling-branch-school-closed.html ...or so the Daily Mail would have you think at least
Who edits that ****ing rag? Surely someone in that whole cmpany said "by the wasy, this didn't happen because the teachers were on strike".
but if they wasn't on strike, she'd have been at school..so in one way, they're responsible. ****ing lazy bastards
I like that their journalists know it's **** so much that they thought, I know let's have a laugh and put a pic of her wearing a hard hat in there, surprised it's not captioned "shame she wasn't wearing this har har"
on the page next to this there was probably an article about why all kids who hang about in parks should be shot
teachers in ireland are (i think) one of the most best paid in Europe, the goverment say their gonna cut their wages and the teachers threaten go on strike. Lazy pricks. My irish teacher and geography teacher are the laziest pricks in the place and another irish teacher can afford buy a new car ever year. It's a ****ing joke.
I was thinking "is the pictue of her wearing a hard hat really appropriate?"...... I backed a horse at yarmouth yesterday and it came nowhere - those bastard teachers have so much to answer for.
imagine if the lesson she missed at that specific time was an immigrant teacher daily mail part - tayyyyyyy
What if the teachers weren't on strike and she went into school and had to read out loud while the teacher abused here. What would they say then?
Jordan, we may be long-lost brothers, but I think that it's ****ing ridiculous to say (even implicitly) that teachers are in any way responsible.
well they are indirectly. if they weren't such greedy bastards, then they'd have been teaching yesterday. which means that girl would have been in school, meaning that tree wouldn't have hit her. it might well have hit a dole scrounger who just spent his JSA on a flaggon of white lightening, unfortauntely...because of said teachers with their greed.. i like the daily mail message below hundreds of furious comments towards the DM about the article "The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline."