The reaction you'll get is people trying to stop me being in the coin toss as one of the most likely townies...
If that happens then it will teach us something. Either way, better than blindly going for a multi way tie or voting at random based on no pattern I can discern. If you have a better suggestion, based on actions taken in the first round, then I'm up for hearing it, but I don't personally believe that just throwing a random vote against someone based on them not being involved in the first round will teach us as much as a more targeted vote. Particularly bearing in mind that you were someone who wasn't under much pressure in the first round, having gone from one of the people in the five way tie to having no votes by nightfall...
I bet I've had more votes cast for me than anyone else has! How can you say I haven't been under any pressure yet? So your logic is going for two people against each other, one of who is highly likely innocent, not a few people, and not anyone who has avoided even being questioned, I.e. Let those who have gone under the radar stay under the radar? Not following you I'm afraid.
I haven't voted yet. I really am tempted to vote for you because you've mentioned me loads in the thread so far and always seem to attempt to get me involved in the votes despite loads of other players being quiet and not saying much, which is your reasoning for being suspicious of me. Yet I'm not convinced that you actually are guilty, and there are other players who seem far more guilty than yourself so I'm not sure if voting for you would be the right thing for the town at the moment.
Cos very few of the votes have stuck, much like they did for Sky. Both of you were in the early running, but faded away once the deadline came. It would be a great KGB / Mafia tactic to attract votes to one of their own, only to then shift them on to other targets. Then claim, as you are doing, that pressure should move on to others. I see that tactic as better than putting a few people, some of which will definitely be innocent, being put into a competition that, based on what we saw yesterday, could be manipulated so the guilty are not in any danger, and then to allow the guilty to claim they have been tested already and that we should focus on others. Besides which, if the object of the exercise is to see how people respond to being under pressure, I would say there is definitely a case for putting more pressure on you, given your late vote switch yesterday and how you are responding to being a front runner at this stage.
Im innocent and therefor I know if you put me up against Astro there is a minimum 50% chance an innocent dies, which isn't good for the town. Your barking up the wrong tree!
Ok, so you're innocent. Guess I'd better ask astro if he's innocent. And when he says he is then I'll know that both the front runners are innocent. So I guess I'll just keep asking people until one of them admits to being in the KGB, then vote for them. Lucaaas, are you in the KGB?
Whatever floats your boat, but I'm innocent and the best theory we have to work on is that I'm innocent. By all means choose to go against the logical decision but you'll be wrong.
The **** did you change to me for Rhc ... I couldnt be arsed looking back to see your reason. Trust me im an innocent. I dont get roles in these games because of how I play them <not very seriously>. Anyhow vote for me is a waste but hey ho.
How is that the best theory to work on? You saying you're innocent is not evidence at all, as it has nothing to back it up - anyone could say exactly the same. What evidence do you have that you are innocent?
It would work in the previous setups as the Don had all the powers for Mafia. The powers are spread in this game so I tend to age with you that it would favour Mafia / KGB.
If I'm voted off, both Gerrez and afcftw decided to bring my name into it. I'm not sure if I want to stick with astro but I'm not changing my vote yet.
