no. i definitely don't think that but I think right now i can say that last time i could see some people were moving around and some didn't and looking back after a couple of says their actions in hindsight were obvious... but without the benefit of said hindsight thats no good really. If nobody is changing at all any change becomes suspicious i suppose but equally that early vote could be suspicious and you can't see it any more. I agree that everyone is on differently so for example danilo was only ever going to be on later in the day whereas rhc will only ever post early in the day. I don't find the level of activity suspicious jsut that the only evidne we will have is the votes... less votes is actually maybe less evidence... maybe not. i don't know right now.
so...... anyway... time to stimulate a different tack. I've decided to ask questions as the vote is tied. 1. IF you were mafia or KGB would you be killing tonight and why? 2. If you were the vigilante would you be killing anyone tonight and why? 3. If you were mafia or kgb and on the vote list why would you sit and do nothing. 4. If you were town role and on the list why would you sit and say nothing? my answers first........ 1. I am not sure. as there are two kills i'd be strongly tempted to use one on the grounds that getting anyone not on my team gone makes it better for me, even if an innocent. I might be wrong in that as others like IBWt last time played completely differently and it did pay off for a while (if only danilo didn't pin lucaas eh) 2. I would not kill as vigilante. I think you must detect some reason to kill mafia or kgb. 3. I agree that a 1/5 shot of being hit aint to bad. We certainly have not got 2 of the same team up or something should have happened by now. But 1.5 shot? prob worth the risk 4. If i had a town role I'd use the same theory as mafia would.
Vigilante cannot kill anyone on first night (to make the highly unlikely chance of Mafia or KGB all being killed together night one impossible: Lynch, opposite team hit, vigilante hit)
1. Hate to say it but I'd shoot you or Astro due to your ability to calculate odds and having played 3 games. 2. Swarbs (obvious reasons), Lucaaas (**** framed me ), or one of the cockneys (why not?) 3. I guess, as stated, while there are 5 involved I'd probably take the risk (but possibly not if the don/kgb boss was on list). Not sure you're right about not having two yet as too early to say but yeah if no big vote change I'd suggest we have max 1 on the list. Bear in mind though we could have one of each and voting wouldn't necessarily change much would it? 4. I wouldn't I'd moan a lot and profess my innocence vigorously (wouldn't I AFC/Bod ) Greez has gone very quiet #workingnodoubt
1) If I was mafia I'd use a kill and go for someone quiet in the hope they are an important member of the opposing faction. 2) if I was a vigilante I'd save my kills as I've got no idea who is mafia or KGB yet 3) if I was mafia I'd be thinking 1/5 chance of death isn't that bad, provided it isn't the hitman. If it was the hitman I'd probably be looking to try and change up who is in the toss. 4) if I had a town role and I was on the list I'd be looking for any way out!
Vote for one of the cockneys? Batard! We have to leave tribalism out of this, I got a few early votes in the last game because I am Chelsea. #logicalnottribal
It's actually a good learning experience, would you not agree MITO? You learn more about how people act and vote by running one than competing in one- because you can see people's motivations "as it happens" rather than just in hindsight.
Nothing personal mate....guess if you do get shot I'll be a target now I've said that I do get the feeling those who keep quiet first day or two are at a massive advantage as they rarely come under suspiscion. Could we have a Polonium option next time for anyone who never posts? Like ebola but much more eastern bloc
He's not been on at all yet, he's not the most active of posters Only once; second night in the first game
