thanks milk that makes sense the converted thing shouldn've come to mind but it didn't... interesting
In which case, I'll vote Sky to make it... [table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"] [tr] [td]Nominee[/td] [td]Votes[/td] [td]Vote(s) By[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Gerrez[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]Hash, Skylarker, RHC[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]AFCFTW[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]Swarbs, Lucaaas, BRB[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Skylarker[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]MITO, Bod, Gerrez[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Lucaaas[/td] [td]1[/td] [td]Billy[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]BRB[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]AFCFTW, IBWT, Astro[/td] [/tr] [/table]
Thought we were going for an even vote across the board That's going well so far then The usual vote swappers messing with our heads #fixers
Not being able to submit the headline until next day is a deliberate thing. If they get key information at a pivotal moment they then have to make the tactical decision of waiting until nightfall (where they might get killed) or out themselves as the journalist. So say "Foredeckdave" (not in this game) was the Journalist and "Sisu" (also not in this game) was the Mafia Assassin. If night 3 Dave investigated Sisu and found out he was "Not Town"- Dave would have the choice of waiting till night 4 to provide the headline- or risking himself by outing himself and telling them during day 4 that Sisu was Mafia to try and get him voted off. At the right pivotal moment in the game it might be worthwhile to out themselves.
Yes but last game he did the same thing in round one, an early vote without saying anything and then left his vote as it was until nightfall. And he was mafia in that game...
Pretty much. Anyone changes, they look suspicious. Danilo or Magic vote differently, they also look suspect.
In fairness Milk played that role last time and was innocent so not something to get fixated on. As long as MITO is consistent with his advice I'd suggest helpfulness/advice is what we need to get at targets. Let's remember Milk had IBWT sussed earlier than the rest of us in the last game
actually your point is an interesting one. as lucaas did vote for you second for not much reason that could be viewed as a suspicion. I didn't really consider brb as making a plea either way. I don't really know enough to say if its a joke or not. I do feel though he was in his rights to vote in revenge really.... for the record I'm always helpful unless its a poll on our matchday #traditionforming.... if you can be suspicious of me at this point thats serious cos i've said from the outset for everyone to vote on peoples actions not on what they say. Later on perhaps if people are trying hard to convinced you to change your mind fine but I always try to clarify the rules and so forth. In any event.... you are on brb right now... I think the vote is split 3 ways. between you, gerrez and brb. I voted sky for no real reason and bod has followed suit. (2) Lucaas has one vote and there are i think 3 yet to vote. It could all change!
Four ways; me, AFC, Sky and BRB http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...-Oct-at-8pm)?p=7157984&viewfull=1#post7157984
We should be suspicious of everything and everyone at this point! And in the first round you can only really go by what people say up until there is something to be found within the votes.
So provided Danilo and Magic vote for Lucas, thats a 5 way coin toss!! If the lynched person is innocent what the hell do we learn? Nothing.....at this stage it would be presumptious to suspect guilt on whoever voted for them since most people are just voting randomly......I know its hard at this stage but there has to be another way other than just leaving it to a random coin toss!! If they are guilty what do we learn? That we were lucky as hell!! We can't even rule out those that voted for them because there are now 2 groups of A-holes, Mafia AND KGB, and they don't know who each other are right? So it the three that vote for the KGB guy (should it happen) could ALL easily be mafia!! This system is gash!
Also if sky is in there for no reason at all and lucaaas we think has some slight suspicion, shouldn't we be getting him in on the action? Although I suppose danilo and magic are yet to vote.
i think bod had him pegged at the same time. Look in fairness gerrez can say i was mafia game 1 all he wants. that has no bearing on today. the only reason to keep throwing it out is guilt deflecting attention.... I must say that my tactics were developed and mentioned pregame and i do not see how i'm different to what i said i would do pre-game. I was looking at what milk did and said last game as the only person to have actually played any more of these than the rest of us and I am just trying to see if we can do something here day one to at least get some scenario where something happens. If that's too helpful fair enough. As I've said i have seen nothing obviously suspicious at all yet and have no reason that any of the 4 being multivoted for should actually be voted for at all. Im as suspicious fo gerrez who keeps talking about game one as I am billy for being nice to me as i am afcftw for poking me. everyone should be poking around looking for info IMO. now... I do expect the lads who voted early like hash and swarbs and lucaas and the guys yet to vote to come on and speak up too... those who voted first and left it have jsut as much reason of being suspects and someone who comes on and changes their vote (sorry astro but i reserve the right to change mine) how's it suspicious to keep it a tie even?
