Soppiest Bollocks October Nominations

Are we talking about the one "Last edited by Millwallsteve; Today at 02:58 PM."

 

Good thing I've kept an original

please log in to view this image

Originally Posted by Millwallsteve

please log in to view this image

Here we go then guys with the revamped rules.

(1) The winning nominator will have to award the trophy to the winner by starting a new thread, in the event of the eventual winner receiving multiple nominations (for the same reason) then the first winning nominator will have to do the honours.

(2) Failure to do a funny trophy presentation to the winner will result in an automatic nomination by default for the winning nominator the next month. Likewise, failure to present the trophy to the winner within 10 days after the vote will also result in an automatic nomination the following month for the winning nominator unless it's unavoidable for a fair enough reason.

(3) The previous monthly winner is up for nomination the following month by default as before.

(4) In the event of a tie the defending champion will automatically retain the trophy by default as before.

I'll cut the month short to get the winner decided by the end of the month so it doesn't overlap into the next month, so worst case scenario if someone does/says something that you think is soppiest bollocks worthy after the vote is up then you'll have to nominate them the following month so no biggie.

Of course I'll still be running the nomination thread with my usual complete and utter fairness that you'd expect of a ruling dictator!

 

FFS you 2 write like solicitors.

 

Ok. Impossible to know who ****ed up.

I nominate Matt for not knowing the rules as above.
Or
I nominate Steve for not knowing the rules as above.

Either way someone's up....... Simples.

 

As long as you can read and understand plain English, the decision is simples....

 

That rules out 95% of the board.

 

Yes Matt

 

Exactly until I changed rule 4

 

But you changed rule 4 AFTER I highlighted your blunder!!!

Unfortunately my legal team at Glory-Chesh and Co are not playing ball

 

Blunder my arse!

Yes because you've made an issue of me awarding the trophy after a draw after all this time when I've always done it and nobody had worried about it before, people are happy to let me get on with it including you up till now!

Now it's crystal clear who awards the trophy in the event of a tie and you're still not happy.

 

My rules Norman on my thread so enough said.

 

So Matts in then?

 

So, you're admitting I was right?

 

Glory, you're supposed to be on my side!!!

 

I prefer to be on the winning side occasionally, so I paddle my own canoe. Steve has you over a barrel so ur on ur own.

 

How exactly. He's amitted he's in the wrong by editing the rules

 

I saw no admission, I saw a clarification. As an expert in weasel words you will understand this.

 

Yes if he's nominated but I'm not bothered.

 

No of course not!

 

Exactly Norman, it must be Matt's time of the month making a big issue of it after all this time.