Think it will be too early for Carrick after the injury and time off he's had. Fletcher? Rafael---Rojo---Blind----Shaw Herrera---Fletcher---Di Maria ------------Rooney ---------Falcao--RVP But I really wouldn't be surprised to see LVG going to 3 at the back again Thorpe, Rojo and Blind!
I honestly don't think it matters who plays centre back in these types of games at OT. United are better off going toe to toe and saying let's see who scores the most. West Ham won't be able to defend deep and attack. They'll have to make a choice. With United weak at the back their best chance is to attack and if they do that I'm confident United can outscore them. could be a 5 3 game I reckon.
Lets see how many ref decisions UiR disagrees with today. None, of course, if they win. I'm gonna play a drinking game, do a shot everytime a United fan moans about a refs decision.....should be fun.
You mean just the one? Lets be honest though, I'm sure there'll be enough Chelsea fans moaning if they get a dubious decision against them with the result going against them also. In principle I agree about the moaning, I've never been one to blame a result on a penalty decision being given against, or not being given for, your team. There are 90 bloody minutes to get the result you want. Why the hell moan about one split second?
I like that little stat that shpws if refs had video evidence in every premier league season, we wouldn't have 13 titles. We'd have 15 titles. Its hard not to say weve been hardest hit by poor referees. Interestingly chelsea would only have 2
Awesome! So someone sat down and watched every game, from every Premier League season since its inception and noted down every decision they thought the referee had gotten wrong? I don't think so.
Well they did. You don't like actual facts do you? More a fan of the delusional myths and legends surrounding the game. I tend to find thats often the case with fans of clubs that need many excuses
Well they didn't. And even if they had, it doesn't work that way norell. If the first goal in a match that ended 2-2 was offside, you can't just scratch it and say the game ended 2-1. The removal of that goal would have changed the course of the entire game. It not as simple as removing goals and decisions that (in one person opinion) were incorrect.
What Bodanki is saying is if RVP goal was ruled out its likely we would have gone on to win 5-0................... This just proves the point with all the decisions that have gone against us(look at the Leicester game for example) no one wants to talk about all defend United in regards to them, but the slightest thing that does supposedly go for us a huge huge deal is made about it because we are MANCHESTER UNITED........ BITTERS
The press are trying to build up this defence nonsense, without pointing out that we have NINE first team players injured. Despite all the hype, we got the 3 points, and thats making allowances for some pretty dreadful refereeing decisions. The main thing for any successful team is to grind out results when your not playing your best football. We were hardly brilliant today, but got the full 3 points. Lets move on now to next weekend
