You haven't been staying over in New Zealand recently musty have you http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-29342577
lol last time I played the pokies in Wanaka and also Queenstown I won, there again I didn't have 100,000 to play with. the joys of New Zealand, magic place
I wish my bank would give me 100,000. there was a bank over there did the same thing a couple of years ago and it was in the millions, the couple took the money and ran to Hong Kong or somewhere, it was like 12 million
Despite losses of £49.8m in 2012-13 and £41m in 2011-12, Liverpool are confident they did not breach FFP regulations, having signed a series of lucrative commercial deals over the past 18 months. how can one run a business like that
I love these FFP regulations, it makes for a far fairer playing field for clubs like us, long may it continue to bite the rear end of clubs like QPR!........
yes i read an article re QPR and their antics, too many ppl with too much money. i wonder how many clubs actually make a profit
If it was just Real seven days later we'd play a strong team but its not, we have Newcastle on the Saturday inbetween too
It probably won't be as weak as you'd think given that Rodgers hasn't won a trophy yet and Chelsea and City are the only sides stronger than ourselves left.
It will prob come down to what injuries does Brendan have and also their PL results between now and then. He may be pressurised into focusing on the PL result at Toolnand
How can any team put in the field by Liverpool,with their resources,etc., ever be described "as weak"? Unless it's to get excuses in early.
Liverpool home match, oops there were 95,000 there [video]http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+liverpool+melbourne&qpvt=youtube+liverpool+melbourne&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=BCD5EE5D4D24EC2B5E22BCD5EE5D4D24EC2B5E22[/video]
'weakened' is the right word yes. Well we might play a 17 year old again so we might not have quite the resources of United, Chelsea, City...
