OT: Mafia game thread starts Sunday 8pm 14/9/14

You have raised my suspicions but I've generally made decisions based on you being innocent

 

Hate to see what I'd do when attacking someone...

just because I'm questioning what you say doesn't mean I'm attacking you or defending someone else, it means I see holes and want questions answering!


The fact of the matter is, I'm doomed now anyway. I protected myself in the last round so I am a target for the mafia this time anyway. No point the mafia trying to target the other cop as I could in theory protect them. Makes more sense for them to take me out and then go for the cop afterwards.

 

I changed early to lucaaas, was happy to go with danilo and learn something at the very least, kill a mafia at the best by lucaaas going.

I made it very clear I thought you should be the other person up for the chop and stand by it!

 

I will point you to comment 1681 good sir!

 

Billy, I could understand you defending yourself and saying I am wrong.
But at this point, with the overwhelming evidence pointing to my innocence, suggesting I am mafia is only going to make you look MORE guilty.

 

I can't be bothered to find it, but I posted more than one comment about lucaaas and at one point watched him to see if he did what I thought he would with his vote and he did, I immediately said he was guilty.

Definitely had him figured out before danilo confirmed it.

 

We've got this Bodanki

Billy's gotta go!

 

You said 1681...

...sorry, but that's hardly a accusation. That is you guys predicting where they would vote so in other words, you had a suspicion and didn't at any point try to swing things towards Lucaas.

But fair enough, you clearly had a suspicion

 

But you are still a possibility. You aren't 100% clear. The only "evidence" against me was fabricated by you and AFC as soon as I voted for him

 

The suspicious voting has nothing to do with what we have saidi someone obviously wanted to save you.

 

afcftw & Bod...

Seriously, you're not going to get anywhere arguing about it like this. You believe Billy is guilty, we get it. You need to convince us why.

Same goes for Billy if he's suggesting either (or both) of you are guilty.


Just saying "your guilty" followed by "no, your guilty" is rather tedious and isn't going to achieve anything.

 

I did... but had no plans to stay on AFC... I was trying to see who would change.

 

Same for me with my switching about, I made it clear what I was doing at the time too. who knows, it may have actually helped in the end

 

Post 1682, 1757, 1800, 1816, 1817, 1819

All posts I suggested or down right accused lucaaas of being mafia before danilo said a thing.

 

The only alternative to the non Lucaaas voters not going with the pretty obvious vote that I can really think of is the Bodanki triangle... a mostly discredited theory now.

Still don't see any logical explanation for Billy.

 

As I keep saying, you've accused everyone several times over so I'm hardly surprised you are able to come up with this I was talking about Bod before

 

Not even slightly curious about the vote changing to stop billy being in trouble every time he topped the votes in that last round? When he was mainly against Bodanki who logically is the most likely innocent person we have. I'd expect that to at least get a mild suspicion...

 

Lucaaas, billy and I think milk are the only people I have said I'm sure are mafia at any point in the game. Anything else has been where my current suspicions are and commenting on things as they happen that make people look guilty, with the odd group of players and the links I could see between them.

Milk I'm back to unsure but suspicious. Lucaaas and billy I have stuck with since deciding they are guilty.

 

Do you not think it could have a coincidence too though? Its not cast iron evidence is it? Especially when I know the vote was:

Bod: 3
Nozzer: 1
AFC: 2
Billy: 4

Before I changed my vote from Billy to Nozzer at one point making it:

Bod: 3
Nozzer: 2
AFC: 2
Billy: 3

This wasn't done to protect Billy, it was done to see if there was a reaction and to try and pull more players into the mix too. Reason for the latter was if we were all wrong about Bod, AFC and Billy then there was a chance I was pulling a mafia member in by including Nozzer in the mix.

Of course, you guys will see this as the votes changing to favour Billy but that wasn't the case.

Again, not protecting Billy at all. I have no real reason to suspect he is a Townie or Mafia

 

The only other thing I've said with certainty was that Bodanki was innocent which seems to be true, that I'm innocent which is true, and on top of that didn't go with either of lynched innocents.

Seems I've called quite a lot right... Plenty of inaccurate theories, suspicions and attempts to get a reaction from retain other players. But things I've set my mind on have generally been correct so far.