Times are suggesting it would be 65mil for di Maria. 10 less than Suarez. ****ing hell, that's a lot of money for a winger. Good player. But not what United need
You dont genuinly support the 352 system do you? Van Gal only used it at the WC because of injuries and suddenly its the best system ever.
Hes exactly what we need and big game players go for big fees. Violent unstable thugs go for reduced fees.
£75million was a reduced fee for Suarez?! **** me wonder how much we could have got for him if he didn't bite at the WC, £100+m?
True, but you are his 2nd choice. In fact you should be praising Liverpool, if we'd pushed for Cavani PSG might have been able to afford him.
you still peddling that ****e, wasn't it a piss take and the figure was in usd or euros as well,cant remember which one.
Still on that one UiR, you keep believing the tax dodgers if it makes you happy. He's the only one claiming 65m.
It was 65million as confirmed by everyone not briefed by liverpool trying to save face. Liverpool are not a club i would believe about anything. Your club lies about everything. Just this pre season an official club poster claimed you were englands most successful club.
Exactly why barcelona are unlikely to lie again. Hence why its 65million. Liverpool however have every reason to lie about the fee. The higher it is tye better they look.
And we bought 3 new first 11 defenders. You bought a player who was **** in Moscow, a cheap £3.5m€ punt for Sporting, had a good world cup and is now worth £16m + nani apparently. Your bitterness is lovely.
any idea on how silly his wages is going to be dave? yeah i know we as fans shouldn't care about ****e like that, but you are obviously going to pay a price in terms of transfer fee and wages to be able to attract class players, just wondering how far off rooneys it is, or rumoured to be.
