Match Day Thread Arsenal vs. Manchester City: FA Community Shield Official Match Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Not one winning side would take any competitive game as a pre-season friendly. Never did a Fergie or Maureen team take the Charity Shield lightly and neither should we. Play our best team and give it our best. Above all, avoid a trouncing!
The unfortunate truth is that without Ozil, Mertesacker and Podolski, we're hardly able to field our best team.
 
The unfortunate truth is that without Ozil, Mertesacker and Podolski, we're hardly able to field our best team.

Already getting in the excuses early for failure before the season has begun eh?

The silver lining of the cloud of a loss against City would (hopefully) be Wenger pushing his efforts a bit higher to get the central midfielder we clearly need. I don't really care what the result is as long as we're not embarrassed.

A win would be great. A loss but with a promising performance would be acceptable. An embarrassment would be not on.
 
Already getting in the excuses early for failure before the season has begun eh?
With all due respect, the adults are talking here. No pointless statements mentioning "excuses" please.

We're missing some important players. Our best team can't be played. That's a fact.
 
With all due respect, the adults are talking here.

a) There's no respect there whatsoever.
b) Saying the 'adults are talking here' is completely contradictory given it's it's the sort of insult a juvenile throws around

No pointless statements mentioning "excuses" please.

We're missing some important players. Our best team can't be played. That's a fact.

It's also a ready-made excuse for if we lose. Stop lowering your expectations.
 
a) There's no respect there whatsoever.
b) Saying the 'adults are talking here' is completely contradictory given it's it's the sort of insult a juvenile throws around
No, it isn't. Just because you've grown accustomed to morons throwing it around when they want a childish argument doesn't mean it always is.

Someone makes a statement about how we must field a full strength team, someone else says we can't do that because we're missing some important players (factually true), and you respond "you're already making excuses huh? Excuse-maker".

Somebody. Said. Something. Factual. "Excuses" is the kind of thing kids throw around at each other because they're not smart enough to respect each other's viewpoints.

Again, you may not have meant it like that ... but that's how it came off. It was not an adult thing to have said and didn't at any point have any relation to the fact which was stated.

a) There's no respect there whatsoever.
Yes, there is respect there, otherwise I wouldn't have said it. I've given you the respect in assuming that you're not a juvenile and that you simply said something juvenile without thinking.
 
No, it isn't. Just because you've grown accustomed to morons throwing it around when they want a childish argument doesn't mean it always is.
I'd really like to hear one instance in the history of mankind where one adult has said to another adult, "excuse me, the adults are talking here" in a respectful way...

Someone makes a statement about how we must field a full strength team, someone else says we can't do that because we're missing some important players (factually true), and you respond "you're already making excuses huh? Excuse-maker".
At no point did anyway say we should field a full strength team. Read back. They said play our best team. ie. best team available to us.

Somebody. Said. Something. Factual. "Excuses" is the kind of thing kids throw around at each other because they're not smart enough to respect each other's viewpoints.
Veiled accusation of me of being a child again and not smart enough eh?

Again, you may not have meant it like that ... but that's how it came off. It was not an adult thing to have said and didn't at any point have any relation to the fact which was stated.
It's not an adult thing to have said that you were making an excuse (or a fact that was being used to excuse potential failure)? You what?


Yes, there is respect there, otherwise I wouldn't have said it. I've given you the respect in assuming that you're not a juvenile and that you simply said something juvenile without thinking.
You've made an implied accusation of me of being a juvenile a few lines up.

Anyway I'm arguing for the sake of it because I'm bored.
 
Not one winning side would take any competitive game as a pre-season friendly. Never did a Fergie or Maureen team take the Charity Shield lightly and neither should we. Play our best team and give it our best. Above all, avoid a trouncing!

I think the Charity Shield is a sort of in-between situation.

We will field our "Best" side, because we want to win, but no one at any club is going to risk an injury by playing a player that isn't fit. So if Sanchez is still short of fitness, he may not play. If it hadn't been a World Cup year, there would be no excuse for that, but as it is we have players that are definitely not fit and some that may not be fit. We will just have to see.

I don't think though that there is anything here that indicates the dreaded lack of ambition, or anything like that, it is just solid coaching and protecting your players for what is a long season.
 
I think the Charity Shield is a sort of in-between situation.

We will field our "Best" side, because we want to win, but no one at any club is going to risk an injury by playing a player that isn't fit. So if Sanchez is still short of fitness, he may not play. If it hadn't been a World Cup year, there would be no excuse for that, but as it is we have players that are definitely not fit and some that may not be fit. We will just have to see.

I don't think though that there is anything here that indicates the dreaded lack of ambition, or anything like that, it is just solid coaching and protecting your players for what is a long season.

I was addressing it to those saying this was some glorified pre-season friendly which is wildly off the mark. We are playing our direct competitors so we field our best side (barring injuries of course!) and then aim for a win. Anything else would be foolish.
 
At no point did anyway say we should field a full strength team. Read back. They said play our best team. ie. best team available to us.
Our best team is a full-strength team.

It's not an adult thing to have said that you were making an excuse (or a fact that was being used to excuse potential failure)? You what?
No, it isn't.

You've made an implied accusation of me of being a juvenile a few lines up.
Again, you said juvenile things. Whether or not you are a juvenile is not determined by that. You're not making a great case right now though.

No point in talking about this. The only thing that matters has already been said.
 
I was addressing it to those saying this was some glorified pre-season friendly which is wildly off the mark. We are playing our direct competitors so we field our best side (barring injuries of course!) and then aim for a win. Anything else would be foolish.

How is it not a glorified friendly? I akin it to the emirates cup except we play less teams. Its a pointless trophy that none of us care about? I am by no means saying play the kids or play a purposefully weaker team. But for example I would rather give someone like Sanchez, Debuchy, Giroud 45-70 mins to get them that much more match fitness before the actual season starts. I am saying prioritise the players getting match fit over the game itself.

The game in consequence to the season doesn't mean that much (unless we get destroyed). We beat a really strong city tam 3-1 last year in pre season and it made no impact on our season. I feel the same about this.
 
How is it not a glorified friendly? I akin it to the emirates cup except we play less teams. Its a pointless trophy that none of us care about? I am by no means saying play the kids or play a purposefully weaker team. But for example I would rather give someone like Sanchez, Debuchy, Giroud 45-70 mins to get them that much more match fitness before the actual season starts. I am saying prioritise the players getting match fit over the game itself.

The game in consequence to the season doesn't mean that much (unless we get destroyed). We beat a really strong city tam 3-1 last year in pre season and it made no impact on our season. I feel the same about this.

Its a season starter where you can show how close you are to finishing preparations and to show your intent. Even though the Charity Shield isn't a coveted trophy, any top team would not like to lose it. As i've said in one of my previous posts, Man U under Fergie never took this lightly and always made it competitive and aimed for the win. Apart from winning bragging rights, you also show the best team in the land and the others you mean business.
 
Murray and Cini65. No need to argue between yourselves.
You're both as patronising as each other. :tongue:
 
we need to win this game , this is no pre season junket .

This IS the first game of the season and we need to set the tone for a flying start .

No more lame ass first 25 minutes.

THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH..!

If we play well and lose it wont be a disaster .

But if we are lukewarm , that will be very worrying.
 
Sagna not fit? That's surprisingly considering he didn't get much playing time at the WC.

Who are they going to play at RB without Sagna AND Zabaleta?