1.elmo 2. rosenior 3. chester Thought rosenior did a great job on moses simon who was causing problems down the wing.
1 - Sagbo 2 - Elmo Can't really pick a third. No one was that good. Ince looked promising but I can't give him it. Aluko good off the bench too, killed a lot of time in the corner as well as getting the winner. We were a bit **** in midfield at times. Brady third for the assist I guess. He wasn't great either though. Needs to make better decisions when he's one on one with the fullback. For all his talent he doesn't beat the man enough. Same with Aluko.
Sagbo - I can see him being the tank to hold the ball up for Long and Ince Elmo - worked hard made errors but was trying different shizz Ince - always wanted the ball and when he did get it , was tricky n all Dissappointed with Snodders Brady and Davies from my unusual isometric view Thought we looked a lot better with Rosie too
Really? I thought Brady was miles off the pace tonight and his first half was dreadful with so many mis placed passes.
My 3 Sagbo Snodgrass Elmo Surprised at the negative comments regarding Snodgrass? I thought he was energetic, decent in possession and he made some decent tackles - almost every one was a border line booking!
Can't believe people are voting for Brady/Elmo. Both of them weren't match fit and had poor first touches throughout.
Chester Sagbo Ince I think people have overlooked Chezzy for a few years now, his reading of the game is world class and tonight he put in many very good tackles
Elmo Sagbo Ince Almost wanted to sing we all hate Leeds scum at Snoddy Going to take time for me to get use to him
1) Sagbo - All round top class performance strength, pace, power and distribution was top notch tonight. 2) Elmohamady - standard Elmo display endless running and threat, great goal. 3) Snodgrass - found a way of being effective and having an impact on the game even though not at his best, played a big part in both goals and gave it 110%.
Exactly my thoughts, funnily enough I used to loathe him, now I lerv him 1 Snodgrass 2 Sagbo 3 Chester Thought Brady was really rusty, lost count of how many balls he gave away / lost in first 1/4 hour but cracking cross for Elmo's goal.
1) Elmohamady - Easily the best player on the park, there was a little bit of luck with the goal but he looked hungry and fully fit. 2) Chester - He looks very comfortable; I know the opposition weren't exactly top class, but he rarely looked troubled and you'll seldom see a more natural looking defender on the ball. 3) Sagbo - If there was anything that was going to convince Tigerroo that Sagbo wasn't Championship standard, it was tonights performance. I don't think he was as good as Elmo, but Sagbo looked much improved through the middle. His hold up play was excellent and while he didn't test their keeper, he did have a lot of shots that were blocked. Trencin were constantly looking to stop him and must've blocked nearly all his shots. A special mention to Moses Simon and their keeper, who I thought were excellent for the guests (despite a few dodgy kicks from the latter). I wouldn't mind a cheeky bid for Simon for our development squad, but I think some bigger clubs than us are after him.
What were you watching? No way was Elmo fully match fit. His first proper run was around the half hour mark. There was some occasions he didn't bother chasing some balls and his first touch/concentration was abysmal. I like Elmo but he wasn't fit tonight. Neither of our full backs who started were.
was frustrating for the first 10/15 mins but his presence on the left (plus he put a pearler of a cross in for our first) shows what we've been missing. He's probably 4th by default more than anything
1. Sagbo - Did everything right, strong, clever, brought others into the game 2. Snodgrass - worked hard, moved across the pitch, put some great free kicks in and assist for the winner. Bit fiery too which I like 3. Davies - Dependable as ever Only considering those who play 90 minutes Chesters distribution is woeful at times and I always worry when he and Elmo are on our rhs.
