First row website have the game down to be streamed....see link http://www.ifeed2all.eu/watch/273828/1/watch-hull-city-vs-trencin.html Another one http://neolive.net/264210/1/Watch-Hull-City-vs-Trencin-/
I would have thought that after last week the fact that a site stating it is going to stream a game means absolutely nothing. A lot of them just list games that are on and provide links at kick off time. However, if no one is broadcasting the game there is nothing for them to link to for a stream. These sites don't send their cameras to a game you know.
It’s a bit harsh on rovertiger. Firstly, he’s (presumably) posted these links for the benefit of others. Secondly, isn’t it probable that he, like most other people, hasn’t checked the TV listings of all possible world broadcasters to deduce there isn’t actually going to be a broadcast to stream?
Agreed. It's bad enough me missing the game but it's not even on telly. FFS Who broadcasts them now? Itv or c5 or bt? Surely it'd get a better viewing figure than Geordie ****ing shore or other such ****e
Has anybody found out why this is the case? I'd have thought Hull City's first home game in Europe would've attracted some interest, not the least to have an excuse to show some live football? Are the club happy it's not on TV? (Aside from being able to sell more tickets, obviously...)
Apparently, we're responsible for selling our own rights for the home leg, you'd think that we could get enough interest from BT or ITV to make it worth showing.
It it would have been televised then surely it would have affected the gates? Although i'm a little disappointed not being able to watch it live, for once it has been a good strategy from the Allams.
It was only £10/£5 a ticket, how much do you think it would have affected the gate? They could have announced it on Monday, when they'd nearly all gone anyway.
