Have a look at the fc v pit village on sky for all the evidence needed that eggchasing ruins the pitch. Believe it or not the commentator blamed the pitch for fc's poor home form. 'Its heavily watered for the football.........excuse, excuse' We haven't played on it for three months you idiot! They are making huge divots all over the pitch, not one of them has attempted to replace the turf the fat bastards are ripping up.
'stop being a gimp' ? Defend the state of the pitch then. A brand new laid pitch at that and it's already full of divots. No football has been played on it yet, although the football club paid for the new pitch to be laid. And Castleford is a pit village.
I think your just a bitter man who has probably been wound up by some Hull Fc fans by the sound of it
Well said matey Some people don't appreciate the qualities of other sports. They just need to let people enjoy what they enjoy and each to their own
Let them enjoy it by all means as long as they pay their own way and stop relying on Hull City subsidising them.
NO the SMC paid for the pitch to be relaid not City, and although they have the same owners they are separate companies with different income streams. Hull City AFC pay them to use the KC as do Hull FC
Equally Hull FC could be seen as subsidising City as they pay more to use the stadium You really need to stop seeing the SMC and Hull City as the same company, they are not
Link ? Who owns the SMC and who owns Hull City? How many sponsors tables/tickets do fc have to purchase for every City home game as part of their rental agreement ? None. But City have to for every fc home game, and they cannot give the ****ers away.
The Allams own Allam Marine as well, but that doesn't mean it is Hull City, although as City owe them around £100 milliom I guess it could be said that their customers are subsidising City
