Henderson better than Ramsey? Hahahahaha, nurse he's out of bed again! P.s. You were spunking your kecks at the idea of Sanchez before he snubbed you for a big club
Sanchez is very good (you wanted him0 Giroud scored 20+ last season Walcott is not out for the season Ozil was in his first season and should now show his Real form Fabregas Ooops , you are right about Carzola or even Arteta (Wilshire is just a joke) Ramsey, get real, he was the best midfielder in the country by a mile untill he got injured. That is still a far better front six than yours.
What is this, does the average score of 27 mean Ramsey was the best out of the games he played before he got injured?
Sanchez = Markovic until he shows otherwise (unknown) Sturridge > Giroud. Not even a question. Sterling > Walcott. Even if Walcott were 100% fit, which he won't be. Lallana > Ozil I like Cazorla but don't think Arsenal use him right Ramsey is good but fitness counts
Which is what i said, before his injury he was the best midfielder in the country by far. Getting injured does not make another player better than him.
Going off this logic Suarez was pretty **** really since he missed so many games (**** it, can never remember which key is the hash) asseriousasyourpost
Ha, by that logic I'm the same ability as Markovic and Aspas is the same ability as Suarez too Agreed One's a world cup winner playing every game and having the best stats of any attacking midfielder in said team. The other is a player who can't get in one of the worst teams at the finals. Lucky for us you're not manager then Counts in what? Your made up criteria of who is better out of Ramsey and Henderson? I mean... Henderson?! I really can't tell if your comments are serious or HIAG-esque!
It does in terms of his actual contribution last season. Not his hypothetical contribution based on his best performances extrapolated to twice as many games.
BBC reporting Man U in for Hummels £16m and Blind £17m WTF, and we prefer Lovren £20m,Moreno £20m , maybe the wages though. I think this is sometimes not considered, if you think about it thought if Lovren was say £70k /week and Hummels £110k / week that is £2m a year so over 4 year contract Lovren saves you £8M really making his price relative to Hummels ,£4M cheaper so equivalent to £12M sounds better. So which would you choose Hummels for 16 or Lovren for 12, personally i think Hummels will struggle for pace and with no Neur to sweep up. Also, a few worrying a bit about the numbers coming in, at least they can be brought in and got upto speed at a governed rate, Man U will practically have to field a whole new defence from the off, at least their game schedule should assist with this but if they don't bed in quickly it could be Carnage Season, the sequel. Might have a crafty tenner on LVG to not last the season.
If you can't tell then just look at the official PL stats for a clue: please log in to view this image BTW, Walcott was the 166th best player in the league. This is the actual league, not the "pretend all our players are fit and in form league". He is set to start training at the end of August, which is Arsenal-speak for he'll be back in November.
Not saying Llama or Hendo better than Ozil, but have not been that impressed with Ozil lately, started OK for Gooners but as the season ended was invisible in some games towards the end. As for being a world cup winner, i think he was the least impressive of the German attacking players, and was very quiet all tournament,maybe was ok against Brazil but again ,well out done by others
He was a liability for Arsenal. We smashed Arsenal because he gave the ball away. And Germany conceded against Brazil because he gave the ball away.
