I don't believe or not believe "the media". I take sources into account and judge things properly. When every single media outlet in the world reports something good for LFC you don't believe it. When a single paper twists a quote to suggest something anti-LFC you jizz your pants.
And you're welcome to our £16m-£20m. I honestly hope it all gets reinvested into the club rather than Fat Kat's chocolate fund
Fat cat is a term for rich, greedy business people. Her name is Kat though so I changed it to Fat Kat. When I call Rooney a fat **** I do literally mean fat though
Arsenal now have a better strike force than you and City`s strike force is better than theirs, even without Negrado. In fact City could loose Jovetic too and still have the best strike force
Disagree. Plus I didn't say "strike force" I said "attack" so I don't just mean strikers and it also includes the willingness of the manager to employ attacking tactics.
So how many media sources are reporting that Soton have accepted a bid that's 3 weeks old? In your own time.....
See Man U (according to reports) are interested in Daley Blind, be interested to see what price they are looking at Dutch player of the Year , can play LB,CB,DM Cmon Brendan, surely a better option than Lovren, versatility is the name of the game LB (need one),CB (left footed) DM(need one) Champions League experience I cannot see how we are not interested, also looked wicked in the world cup where he played LB and CB ( did well for my fantasy team anyway,clean sheets,assists and a goal)
Maybe a slight difference in wording but i meant attack also (front six) Sanchez...Girud...Walcott Ozil......Fabregas......Ramsey Lot of goals in there and some good defensive work too
Sanchez is unknown in the PL Giroud is nothing Walcott is injured Ozil is inconsistent and a liability Fabregas is a Chelsea player Ramsey is ok. Henderson is better. You should have used Cazorla but even then I wouldn't rate Arsenal's attack anywhere near as good
