Like I said on the other thread this is lazy writing made worse by the fact that the **** is getting paid as well. It didn't deserve one thread. It certainly doesn't deserve two.
It's on a betting site, clearly there to make Average Joe think 'Hull must be awful yet they're still offering good odds on them going down. Best put my money on it'. Ladbrokes know you'll most likely stay up but they've written the article to make people think otherwise.
ah your right I forgot he was injured straight away, he played brillianty in autumn 2009 in iur second season and thats when the infamous/famous man city celebration took place
initially I read the title of this thread to mean "Why does the board keep referring to pple as "clown shoes"... I was gonna reply: "cos they're like kids in a playground, give em a year or so at calling everyone a clownshoe and they will grow out of it." next school term it will be something else, mark my words.
Burnley head into the new season as the runaway favourite for relegation from the Premier League but with odds of 3/5 offered through Ladbrokes, those seeking a bet with a bit more value could do worse than back Hull City to fall through the trap door. Priced at a distant 16/5 to go down next term, there will be some pointing to the signings of Robert Snodgrass and Tom Ince as evidence that the Tigers will have more than enough attacking bite for the season ahead yet, as so many before them can attest, that may not be enough http://news.ladbrokes.com/en-gb/foo...mier-league-hell-short-term-bruce_204597.html Brucie has obviously won some bookies and pundits over if we're not odds on to go down. We did finish 16th though so I'm a bit surprised City are regarded as having a less than 25% chance of being relegated.
