I like our new badge to be honest. It's clear what allams trying to do, but if there was no ulterior motive i'd like it. Couldve just stuck the name underneath and it'd have been perfect. Looks modern and simple. Not a fan of West Hams new one though. Looks like what Pro Evo do when they don't have the license. I just keep seeing London Hammers
Ah yes, that was when the dodgy chairman got his student son to design it for about 5K. The perils of having people who know **** all about our heritage and identity running a club.
I do not want to be mistaken for Castleford, Leicester or Cottingham Tigers. I support Hull City. Always have, always will.
Not really a proper poll though is it. The design has been changed and fans just get to pick the colour.
please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image I'm sure ours will be immediately and clearly identifiable as Hull City to non HCFC fans in the Far East
http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=149876&sid=423974ddc2a208f546a2eefa6f59f952 Lively discussion.
Especially with Castleford tigers and Leicester tigers' public attempts to enter the eastern markets.
'The Tigers' is almost uniquely ours. '[Location] Tigers' on the other hand is used all over the place, Allam's attempt to downgrade from THE tigers to just the regional ones is small-time thinking.