But so is debating players, who we should shouldn't buy, what the best line up is etc... we still do it though
It's not a debate, it's sensible people going with the best available facts and then one or two #bitters desperately wishing it was lower
This! Regardless of the amount reported, it wont change what the real figure was, no matter what it was. BR still has the that amount to spent, so it doesnt really change all that much to be honest.
You lay into us in nearly all your posts on other teams board but if you cant add anything like sensible debate on our board then piss off before you're booted
bless i am on your sig, how ****ing old are you uir, and you tell me to grow up jesus feking christ. is there any mancs on here that are not immature bell ends? or keyboard warriors like lee! this forum is going to ****, like a playground!!
Youve been there since the day you blubbed after every post i made. It saved me responding to you. Have you noticed its only liverpool fans (a select few who we all know, coffin dodgers) who claim the forums going down hill. Usually after somethings happened at liverpool, usually something not too positive. Strange eh?
Care to suggest how something bad happening in the world at large could mean this board is going down hill? Another logic breakdown to add to the list. Of course something negative about our club might contribute to it's decline, but only in the sense that it generates a large amount of childish, unimaginative wind-ups we have to wade through to get to discuss said event.
Absolutely this! Only saw figures between £70m and £80m on here, well apart from the contribution from Tobes and UiR him self
As astro said its only our detractors that cling to the £64m. Its been accepted since he signed his new contract that the clause would be triggered by a bid of no less than £75m, but now all of a sudden its £64m.
New forum rule, fans making wild statement and failing to back them up get a yellow card, keep it going and get a 24 hour ban All it takes is one quote to back crap up so yer warned
Oh and this 64 mil comes from the club that paid 49 mil for neymar apparently, the fee was way way over it so live in fantasy land all you want there's manus an article published even in the bitterest of papers saying 75 mil
Ok mito... How about yourself saying 120million... Will that do? http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...G-ready-to-offer-50-million-Cavani-for-Suarez
