Well they say a leopard never changes its spots and early pictures suggest the mouthy Uruguayan to be guilty of world cup cannibalism. What say ye?
I'd agree with this. And they need to extract his teeth- make him wear dentures but leave them out on match day! Although, if he were all gummy- Rooney might find him a little bit too irresistible.
Can realistically only be an international ban but can't see where a transfer ban would be a punishment, Liverpool aren't that poor.
Im pretty sure zidane got a ban from all footbal after the world cup even doe he was going to retire anyway suarez should get the same i say a season ban and a lot of community work telling kids not to do the same stay in school blah blah. thats what i would give if i was in charge
Who knows with fifa, wouldn't be surprised if Blatter comes out and says they should just shake hands
He is feral, needs a lengthy ban. Maybe caged or at the very least a muzzle. Pure scum. Good player when not biting folk but his disciplinary issues mean he can't be classed alongside the top brass. Bit of a liability.
JT's policeman friend who heard from his cousin's aunt's gardener's window cleaner who listened to the radio about his racial comments should give his Brazilian friends a phone call.
Two year ban from all football with the second year being suspended on the condition that he gets ongoing psychiatric help during the first year.
I think this one is going to be more tricky than it first appears ... and purely down to 'technicalities'... The facts are that the incident was not seen by officials so it's now a case of 'trial by television replay' ... the Urugyans are already saying .... "... issue, what issue?" and that if there is retrospective punishment for this 'incident' then FIFA, in order to be consistent on TV exposing 'foul play' need to look at other incidents not spotteed by the officials e.g Giroud and Sissoko of France both throwing deliberate elbows last night that connected with the faces of (admittedly fouling by 'hugging') Ecuadorean defenders ... the Urugyans are saying that whatever Suarez did (and that even that is 'inconclusive') was not as damaging (potentially dangerous) as those other events so why take retrospective action on Suarez if you do nothing about those others? ... they will undoubtedly seek to attempt to separate events here at the World Cup from any past 'history' ... and you can see how they might do it .. i.e if Suarez punishment is partly determined by similar prior offences in club football then should it only be equitable to look back at Giroud and Sissoko's historic use of the elbow / dangerous play? ... Now before everyone gets 'hissy' on me, I'm only playing devils advocate here and putting my take on the stance that it appears to me the Uruguyans are attempting to take ... one thing for sure, the worms are wriggling out the can
