Oh yeah, I forgot he has bad spark-plug management abilities, demonstrated in Australia And of course, he 'broke' his own car. How ****e is Vettel then based on your opinions then? Keeps breaking his car all the time, yet his teammate is doing just fine
Renaults problems have been written about about everyone, as to Ricciardo, I fully expected him to give Vettel a good run for his money and am not surprised, I can't wait for RBR's next young prodigy Kvyat to give RBR a selection headache, their young driver program pisses all over the others. As to Canada he was questioning his brakes and was told about them, and STILL pushed Rosberg, and then his car broke, of course I wouldn't expect someone as besotted to accept that, despite it being a recurring problem he's had throughout his F1 career, along with losing his head, probably up his own arse. oh, the mouth piece protects thier drivers massive fragile ego, there's a shock.
Yeah, backing off by 3 secs a lap (as instructed by his team and done so along with Rosberg) is really pushing hard .......... ......... but, I wouldn't expect someone so blinkered against an individual to accept that........ You should read the signature on my posts to see that you have become one of the people you don't like.......... As for RBR, Daniel doesn't have the same problems as Vettel, so surely it must be just Vettel causing the issue?
Ricciardo was told not to do what Seb did AFTER seb had done it, not before, which is quite big difference, unlike Hamilton who tried to outbrake Rosberg and his car broke. As to your I think F1 would be poorer without them, I appreciate the talent doesn't mean I have to have any repect at all for the person, especially when there is nothing in the character worth respecting, like in Hamiltons case. It wouldn't be poorer without his obsequious, deluded fan boys though, as he's being beaten by a mediocre driver, none of you can handle it, the falling of your idol and you vent spleen at anyone who says what a **** he is. You, Dhel, Gramp and Fevril, The Four Hamelots. You didn't used to be so bad, but he wasn't losing a 2 horse championship the last few years, I guess you had an excuse for his failure now it's a different story and it's tears at bed-time.
yeah, whatever. Read my posts from Monaco, Austria etc about what I thought of Hamilton, then kindly remove me from the 'Hamelot' list, or just read posts that people take the time to put on here before tarring everyone with the same brush, oh wait, of course you say yourself you don't do that
For the record I would obviously respect Toto Wolff's view of events at Canada over yours. That's because he is Toto Wolff and you are just somebody.
I think there could be some validity in a team protecting (or not slating) their star driver, whether it's true in this case we will probably never know. There will be varying views as always and regardless of the tone it's hard to argue which are right and which are wrong. It is possible that certain driving styles may put more pressure on the already temperamental designs and different drivers may benefit (unknowingly) from their own style.
Bloody hell fire... honestly Miggs, stop being so insulting. You're on the verge of being unable to post without ranting or insulting someone these days.
Hamilton has entered the season's ending races 2 maybe 3 or 4 times fighting for the championship so Rosberg may yet choke(no experience of a title fight), but he must at least get the gap down to a single or low double figure entering the run in at Singapore.
Rosberg is a very good driver and has proved that these last two seasons, he's beating Hamilton mentally and on track at the moment. However, whilst they have both made mistakes under pressure this season so far, the biggest test for them will be during the last few races of the season when the pressure is really high. If Mercedes have the constructors in the bag before Abu Dhabi then I can't see them sharing data and effectively giving themselves equal machinery in terms of setup like they do now. I don't want to sound bitter here but I think Rosberg has relied on Hamilton's data to get him on equal terms during a race weekend a lot of times this season. Just my opinion though.
oh no, shame on him, the sharing data policy is only for when Rosberg [by pure luck] chooses a better car setup than Hamilton, to ensure he never has even the slightest car advantage, right? funny thing is that's probably the reason Hamilton made them do such a thing, just like when he was at McLaren, seems like the kind of thing he would obsess over and think would only benefit him, as he would obviously beat anyone in an equal car anyway. Something makes me think this season hasn't quite gone the way he planned.
So... Hamilton in a nutshell: 1. Bottler. 2. Is responsible for breaking his car. 3. Has a lousy teammate and is being schooled by him. 4. Has to resort to stealing his teammates setup to be able to complete. Did I miss anything from the list? Makes ya question why anybody would put such a terrible driver in a car. AND... then choose to pair him with such mediocrity as Rosberg. #Not606Logic
5. If his team say he didn't break the car, they are obviously lying. 6. If he is trailing because of more DNFs, it is still because Rosberg is driving better.
I apologize.... I glanced them and thought they were pro Hamilton. (Reading on the bog first thing). Or maybe I'm being converted...
