Cash and a PL player is not bad for a league one striker ? But yes i agree he could well stay in the fatherland. An interesting tweet of Proschwitz in Las Vegas the other day watching Jamie O'Hara have a barny with wife Dani Llloyd.
It was actually Prozzy and his mates who were having a barny with Dani Lloyd, hubby was just telling her to shut up.
I don't think Proschwitz is a PL player though. He didn't really cut the mustard for Barnsley, so I don't think Peterborough will be that impressed, especially when they're not really in a position where they have to sell. If we offered them £3.5-4m they'd probably accept it, maybe loan them a youngster to fill the void (if they're good enough)
According to sources at Stoke (and due to the arrival of Sidwell), Steven N'zonzi has been told he can leave the Brittania. If we can get him for less than £5m, I'd have him if we can't get Livermore back.
According to wikipedia he has handed in a transfer request the last 2 seasons. Seems that he is more than willing to go somewhere else.
I'd be happier if we paid the asking price for jake with a 4 mil down payment and add ons! We deffo know what we're getting with jake.
yep we do, an okay player; his influence on games is terrific but unfortunately in more games he doesn't contribute enough to warrant a £6.5m fee. Best game for me was WBA away. At £6.5m he is not value for money nor are we likely to see a return on such an investment
We're not in a position to be looking at getting a return on a player I don't think! We need to stay here for a few more years yet, then we can maybe think about getting players who'll have a sell on value! We still need to pay over the odds because selling clubs know we haven't got the youth system yet! It's all about staying up and if that means we pay one or two mil over the odds to do so well so be it.
According to that logic then we should only buy players over 30. Of course we're looking for players with a sell on value, that's how we got into such a mess in the first place. The vast majority of Bruce's signings all have a decent sell on fee
No I'm saying looking for a sell on fee After having a player for 3 years shouldn't be the thinking behind buying a player or not! We need to stay in this league and all the spin offs will look after themselves!
With our gate receipts unless we sign players (not always) but in the majority of instances where we will get a return after the initial contract concludes, then we make a profit. Remember the Allams run the club as a business and what it to become self sustainable. Pay c£15m every season for incoming players, get nothing back, and we are fuc*ed.
Looking at players sell on value is pointless. Did we have re-sale values in mind when we considered buying Jelavic, Davies, Boyd or Huddlestone? If we only focused on that, then we'd only ever buy really young players. In essence we're already thinking about selling players on before we've even bought them, which is completley insane and undermines the player in question.
FOLLOWING Matty Fryatt’s departure from the Tigers to Nottingham Forest last night, Hull City are said to be facing another transfer target battle this summer after West Brom joined the race to land Spartak Moscow forward Majeed Waris. The Daily Express reckon the Tigers are keen on the forward and that Albion have now submitted their own interest in the striker, but join a long list including newly-promoted Leicester City, Everton and Newcastle. Waris is said to be keen on a move away from Russia and the 22-year-old was hoping to put himself in the shop window this summer in Brazil as he looks to represent Ghana at the World Cup, but is now a doubt for the country’s opener against the USA after picking up a thigh injury just five minutes into their friendly against South Korea in Miami yesterday. http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...tory-21211511-detail/story.html#ixzz34Ee4MW2A Edit: This Abdul Majeed Waris looks a bit of a handful... [video=youtube;rX1slv9uJnI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX1slv9uJnI[/video]
