Personal insults and juvenile posts. That's all you've got. No evidence. Should be easy if there were quite a few wishing ill of Laudrup as you claimed.
Its obvious your not worth the time , plus if it isn't worded petfectly you would pull your "between the line " defence , semi pitifully I might add . Good man vetch , don't waste your words on a twister of words .... he'll never be happy .
No insult,just an obvious question based on the level of your output on this Forum. Let me repeat myself - you need/want proof, go find it yourself.
Contradicted yourself in the first line. You stating that Laudrup is the most succesful is opinion. I would argue that it is Martinez.
you two cyber warriors are nothing but wind up merchants .you follow people around stalking them like two little girls ffs... why cant you accept others have their own views and leave it at that...I know for a fact that one or both will come back at me with more bullshit but guys Hot news...I don't care...If it was me ganging up on someone i would soon be banned...Jesus grow up and get a life man...and accept your not always right...
I am familiar with him breezy. As I have previously stated,anyone needing to incorporate the name of a gun into his name, has some serious problems. He only fires blanks anyway.
Don't be an oaf. Our highest position in the Prem and a cup win = our most successful manager, regardless of what happened afterwards. Why some find this a difficult thing to grasp is beyond me. It's not opinion is it? You don't have to be pro or anti Laudrup to get it. It's like arguing the sea is made of concrete - it's simply not true. Bloody hell the rubbish that's spouted on this forum sometimes.
In your opinion Dragon. Rodgers and Martinez achieved at least the same as him. I still consider what Martinez did as better as he wasnt a one season wonder. Rodgers getting us to the PL also hails as a better achievement.
Bleeding hell. Another one who quickly resorts to personal abuse. I never even said it wasn't my opinion.
