If he played for Chelsea, United or City, he would not be so hated. It is only because he plays for such a hated, despicable club that he is mocked so mercilessly.
Looking very unlikely now. Wasted talent. Jose or Fergie could have made him world class, a winner rather than loser
Hmm....I noticed how most of them migrated to the West Ham board yesterday clutching at straws. Only goes to show that if the Scousers were a bit pragmatic and less naive they would be celebrating today instead of the rest of the Premiership.
Laughable, the money Chelsea spent and man for man V's each others squad you should have been out of sight, and you know it
Why? City's squad cost more. Why should we be out of sight? Did Torres, Eto, Ba cost more than Aguero, Dzeko, Negredo, Jovetic
You spent nearly as much on Johnson than City did on their entire back 4. You're the 3rd highest spending side in PL history, but don't let facts get in the way like....
Judging by DR's logic the biggest spenders should finish top, so Liverpool should have finished on average third for the past 20-odd years. Gerrard should probably have won a title after all that spending by KK
This season, which is what im on about. Chelsea have spent more anyhow if you want to talk about the other seasons. But dont let facts get in the way like...........
You're asking the wrong geezer, he knows nothing of football, he's on here to be a snide only, ratboy
But you said Chelsea should be 'out of sight' because they have the most expensive squad man for man. Do we have a more expensive squad than City? You seemed very sure on post 6... "Laughable, the money Chelsea spent and man for man V's each others squad you should have been out of sight, and you know it"
Shark head has spent £100m in 2 years, and only managed to buy 2 players that actually improved the team. But of course you'd have the World believe you're skint and spend buttons Liverpool FC still the biggest spending club on the planet who've not won their domestic League in the last 20 years
By your logic. Even more Laughable that you've spent more than Arsenal and United, and they've won 16 titles to your zero
Furthermore Arsenal & Chelsea fans didn't threaten to Kill the families of RVP or Jaun Mata when they wanted to move on unlike some others.
Sorry to interrupt the argument that has sidetracked itself to spending, but I tend to agree about Gerrard. He also did himself no favours with the bar brawl, but then he's not the first footballer to prove that intellect is not a necessary component of football talent.
£35million on Carroll £16million Henderson £20million on Downing £25million on Ilori and Sakho Ok we spent £50million on Torres but Liverpool fans can't just say that 'it's because we haven't spent the money' when you have as well. Not as much granted but it's still a lot.
Dalglish signed the the first 3 of your 5 examples, what relevance have they got to the season just finished? Why not just compare both clubs transfer spends from last season?
Because DR's post was: "Laughable, the money Chelsea spent and man for man V's each others squad you should have been out of sight, and you know it." Having spent the most money (eg King Kenny), does not guarantee you trophies. And man for man squad wise, City have the most expensive squad anyway. You've spent more than United since the Prem began, yet United are "out of sight". 13-0. You haven't won one Premiership despite being the third biggest spender. Normally the third biggest spender would win one title in 25 years in their domestic league, especially when you have the best players Stevie and RAcist, and the best fans in the world!
