He isn't the only one, its aimed at him at times too, and when its tit for tat, i don't bother, if people take offence to anyting he says to them, there is always the PM fucntion, but I haven't got any pm's complaining
You are a mod and you don't need PM's to act. And I haven't seen Dai using vulgar abuse, at least not in this thread. So are you going to do what a moderator should do?
Your right, I am a mod, and I don't have to wait for PM's, I just chose to do so, as if someone is offended, they can PM.
I wonder if this non-moderating form of moderating contributes to the arguments that always seem to happen here.
I don't claim to be neutral or objective - do you? I do believe the board are doing wrong, I believe Monk and Jenkins are bad for this Club (if it wan't to progress). Nothing much positive about that! BTW I'm afraid I can't remember any of your comments at all, maybe they're too neutral and objective to make any impact at all?
mathematically after Monk took over, but we were never going down. I could have managed the team and made more astute team selections and subs than Monk. MONK OUT
Well Monk improved the points per game ratio of the team - it was trending down under ML. But, hey, that has been argued to death on her since February.............