1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

No big spending for some clubs

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by HRH Custard VC, May 6, 2014.

  1. EatMyHole

    EatMyHole Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    17
    £70-£80 million should do it.
     
    #21
  2. ProjectVRD

    ProjectVRD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,174
    Likes Received:
    192
    As an incentive for FFP there should be a points incentive, one point for every million in profit pre-tax plus a positional multiplier. So Arsenal with their £7M profit last season would see 7 points added plus their fourth position meaning 7x4=28 points added to their total.

    It would also mean that smaller teams with smaller revenues do not endanger their future such as 9th placed Swansea having £21M profit last season would have got them 21x9=189 points added at the end of the season.

    Seems fair to me.
     
    #22
  3. Treble

    Treble Keyser Söze

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    57,183
    Likes Received:
    47,997
    Anything that rewards you more for finishing lower in the league suits me considering where we've just finished. 17 x 7th = 119 points woohoo!!
     
    #23
  4. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,501
    Likes Received:
    12,522
    You would still finish 10th or worse and UTD would win it every year
     
    #24
  5. ProjectVRD

    ProjectVRD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,174
    Likes Received:
    192
    Actually United didn't figure in the Top 3 for pre-tax profit and Arsenal were third with £7M. Swansea would be 100 points better than Manchester United in this fairer league. ;)
     
    #25
  6. By the time the loan ended (aka like Suso) yes, he was 20!
     
    #26

Share This Page