You see that's where your pomposity ****s you up. I very rarely use barrack room language unless it's in direct response to ignorant ****ers like yourself. You come on here and, in your very first post, trot out some cowardly vague insult. Then start with the tears and and pathetic hypocrisy when you're insulted in kind. You're really not very good at this kind of thing. Why not content yourself with looking at the world through your curtains, every 5 minutes, and engaging the poor postman with your riveting conversation.
A couple of little lies there Smug boy, understandable when your not having it all your own way. I think my cowardly vague insults have hit their mark with a cowardly vague person. Donât flatter yourself that you could ever hurt me, they say sarcasm is the cruellest form of wit, but I thought even a throwback like you would recognise that. You can dish out all the puerile insults you like at me, itâs water off a ducks back, in fact, I bet I could teach you a few if I had more time, I donât want to judge you, you are what you are, a Walter Mitty with a selective memory. To engage in heated debate on an internet forum with a no name, which hopefully I will never have the misfortune to meet is futile, Iâve had my entertainment for today so I will once again bid you good day.
Is English your first language One is a fact which my posts always show. I always respond in kind and am polite & reasonable if people deserve it. The vast majority of my posts have no bad language or name calling. The second is my opinion, you're really not very good at this type of thing and are nowhere near as clever as you believe. In all honesty, you've had no entertainment whatsoever, unless backtracking & squirming is what turns you on. You came on here with an insult which shows what a little snide you are. Now you're scurrying off because you have nothing but more bullshit. I don't tell lies on here and will back up what I say and stand by it. Cowards like you love to make accusations you can't back up. Now run along and do your 'neighbourhood watch duties', the local schoolgirls will be walking past your twitching net curtains. You'll be able to hold them open slightly with your free hand
And that really is the best you've got isn't it Hurry up now, those curtains won't twitch on their own ........
I was 'confronted' by some stanley wielding evertonians on two separate occasions down at Goodison, back in the very early nineties. 20 years ago that is. Lovely lads they were..
Can you post the actual quote from the Taylor report that apportions any blame to fans? If so I fully accept being wrong and I haven't read the report, but if my memory serves me correct, that report served to exonerate fans rather than blame them. Should add, I also feel that police and Liverpool fans are to blame for the disaster, the innocents are the ones who died. I hate this media garbage forced down my throat to remember Hillsborough and have a minute silence etc etc, Heysel and Bradford never get mentioned, it's just the media darling tragedy and I'm sick of hearing about it.
Well what a ****ing surprise ........... yet you still argue with someone who has How can your memory serve you right if you don't know the facts? The report didn't serve to exonerate fans or blame anyone else, it was an unbiased entity formed to establish the truth. The Taylor report is available on-line for anyone to read, why not do that if you're really interested?
I haven't argued with anyone, just questioned an assertion. You stated just a few posts back that you always back up what you say on here, I am asking you to do just that and provide the "quote" that you have referenced over and over again on this thread, which I frankly don't believe exists. Be true to your word and I shall retract all of this
Fair point, trophy cabinet boasting is something we North-Easterners really can't brag about, even Boro put us in the shade. Debate the semantics if you want, I personally don't class that as an "argument". Will you back up your claims or do you confess to being a liar? It's YOUR turn to not sidestep a question...
Let me making something so clear that even a dullard like you can understand. I don't need to prove anything to you, I don't jump when you snap your fingers and I don't give a **** if you retract anything or not. You go through the Taylor Report and prove me wrong .......... then come back
But your quote was, "I don't tell lies on here and will back up what I say and stand by it." So if you don't back up your claims, you are a liar, one way or the other. Nice to see you doing some of the backtracking you so despise though
I'll always debate anything with decent people. I can't be bothered with ****ers like you so think what you like, OK? I'm not lying, I just can't be arsed to go through the Taylor Report when you won't apologise when I prove you're wrong.
Strange, I thought you never resort to that kind of language unless forced, and always respond in kind? I have done nothing but question an assertion you keep making and asked you to provide some substance to your claims. I've got you running round in circles like a dog chasing it's tail Must hurt your ego, how will you ever show your face (or username) on this website again?!
You've behaved like a tosser with me on other threads and are generally an arsehole, which is why I'm responding in kind. I'm not running around at all and won't for bellends like you ..... just repeating it doesn't actually make it true. As I've said, you want the proof from the Taylor Report, you go and read it. People like you aren't worth my time.