I would guess (and sincerely hope) that the "probably" refers to the likes of Osvaldo, Forte, and possibly Hooiveld, i.e. they probably won't be met with a "no, not for sale".
They will be met with a "and it's free same day deliver, sir"
I would guess (and sincerely hope) that the "probably" refers to the likes of Osvaldo, Forte, and possibly Hooiveld, i.e. they probably won't be met with a "no, not for sale".
Serious point, shouldn't it be an offence to lie to the media that you are close to signing another team's players?
I don't suppose they would get many journalists willing to testify, for fear of losing access, but it's pretty underhand isn't it?
Serious point, shouldn't it be an offence to lie to the media that you are close to signing another team's players?
I don't suppose they would get many journalists willing to testify, for fear of losing access, but it's pretty underhand isn't it?
Serious point, shouldn't it be an offence to lie to the media that you are close to signing another team's players?
I don't suppose they would get many journalists willing to testify, for fear of losing access, but it's pretty underhand isn't it?
So then do what we did with Chamberlain and say we'll only sell him if we get a ridiculous offer?
Assuming they aren't actually talking to Shaw though, this isn't quite directly communicating with a player, though it's an obvious attempt to unsettle him. I'm sure this kind of thing does go on all the time, but should it?
Assuming they aren't actually talking to Shaw though, this isn't quite directly communicating with a player, though it's an obvious attempt to unsettle him. I'm sure this kind of thing does go on all the time, but should it?
Guessing the guy I know was right. The poster that said the deal had been agreed and Shaw was talking about personal terms with a guy he knows needs to report that guy.(iif true)
It shouldn't but does. I think it happened with Chamberlain as well.
I don't think his value is inflated. In the world where players like Neymar cost around 100 mil, Shaw for 30 is a bargain.
Although that world doesn't yet exist, as Neymar didn't even cost half of that.
(Though if you're including the hidden illegal add-ons, though, gets close to £70m or so. Basically a Luke Shaw in illegal payments.)
Les Reed's comments are pretty much exactly where I expected the club's position to be. I'm really glad he's come out and made his statement simply because rumours tend to gain credence as people talk about them, and then the fervour builds. Let's be clear - the basis of this actual thread is rumour. As long as we are aware of that, as we pass comment back and forth, then we are being realistic. Let's remember that the if's, but's and maybes are all hot air and that one need not be worried or concerned when one sees a new rumour. I know there are people out there who are.