The Official Man Utd & Liverpool plus Chelsea, Everton and City Banter Thread!

Should have gone for it and liverpoils title challenge should have ended.

Tainted title if they win it now.

 

The trailing leg clips Suarez foot. he went over when he could have kept going but there was contact so no booking but no free either. Good call by Clutterbug imo

 

Must be eating you, did it really piss you off when we scored the winner?
your bitterness is so thick in the air you could almost butter toast with it

 

No such thing exists. Good call by clattenberg lol.

 

No, Suarez dived over his leg and then did his usual 3 tumbles, a leg grab in 'agony' combined with contorted grid.......the cheating twat.

 

maybe he didn't mean to make a good call, but it was a good call, no free no yellow for dive.

 

Are you saying there was no contact?

Have you seen Barkley do the same thing?

Answers should be No, and Yes.

 

He shat out of making the correct call, but hardly a first for "our Mark"

 

What's Barkley got to do with it?

It was a blatant dive and he should have gone for it.

 

Didnt think you would be clever enough.

 

Anyway he could have cost you a title if tge ref didnt bottle it.

How would you have felt Sisu. Or any Liverpool fans had justice been done.

 

You won't accept there was contact as then you have to conceded the ref cannot give a yellow if there was contact.

the question is not whether Suarez went down easy or not, he obviously did. If there is contact there is no yellow. It wasn't a foul but the ref can't book Suarez either

I mentioned barkley as he's a diver

 

Tobes, if that was Young that did it, they would say its a dive.

 

that's not the question idiot, the question is should there have been a yellow?

 

No one is mentioning that Kompany's challenge was a peno though

 

If there was any contact at all, then it was created by him ffs & he was already on the way down, as he'd lost control of the ball and saw an opportunity for a belly flop.

If a player dives and lands on top of an opposition player are you suggesting that somehow gives him impunity? Utter drivel.

 

You talk some ****e in your manic I hate Liverpool rage.

The trailing leg of the defender clipped Suarez leg, not the other way round. I guess you'll now go else where talking about Liverpool fans saying how it was not a dive after this post. What a loser, going round all the other boards talking about Liverpool, you are looking good for CL and you talk talk talk about Liverpool

I reiterate, contact, not a foul, Suarez did a pirouette. No free no yellow was the right call. if you can't get your rubber head around that then I can't help you.

You are one of those fools that thinks if you keep talking and talking it makes you right

 

This is a United, Liverpool and Everton banter thread, so it's perfectly relevant to discuss it here you dolt.

How the **** could the defender 'clip' Suarez when the buck toothed cheat is behind him and he's looking the other way?

Suarez WENT OVER HIS TRAILING LEG, with the intent of conning the referee into giving a foul, it's therefore simulation you daft twat.

 

"Dolt" "****" "Buck Toothed" capital letters.

All the hall marks of a ranty manic lunatic mate, seriously, how does this **** get you so worked up, go get a cup of tea and have a *** of something.

if you wish to deny the laws of physics, fine, but the defender cut across Suarez path and his trailing foot made contact with Suarez, not the other way round. Was it a foul No, was it a yellow for diving no, does Barley do the exact same thing without us Liverpool fans ranting about it? Yes

You talk some ****e, you keep talking ****e over and over till the other gives up trying to make you see sense. A pattern all to apparent in any discussion you get involved in. Myopic clown who must never ever be wrong

Dive yes, card no, free no. Simples

 

So you admit he dived then, if it's a dive it's therefore simulation, therefore a booking, therefore a 2nd yellow, therefore a red card......

Thanks for clearing that up.