The Official Man Utd & Liverpool plus Chelsea, Everton and City Banter Thread!

Cant see it at all but would like Jose to be sacked


City and Chelsea at Anfield are biggies and we'd do very well to beat them. Hope we fly out of the blocks and take the game to them

Also the other games against 'lesser' opposition are the games that worry me as well

So in a nut shell, Im worried about every single game left!

 

Chavs and City play before us this coming weekend City at home to Southampton and Chavs at home to Stoke. Big pressure on them both to win neither game a banker.

 

Chelsea have so far sacked the league winning manager ( Mourinho ), a manager who was very close to a CL and League double ( grant ) another title winning manager ( Carlo ) a CL winning manager ( RDM ) and a Europa League winning manager ( Rafa ).

I certainly can see it, especially considering what Jose is getting paid to win the title not put up a challenge.

 

RA certainly has an itchy finger and has made Chelsea look stupid on a few occasions


With how Jose has spoke though I think he's under the impression that the sugar daddy will actually be more patient

 

Or maybe Maureen just reckons he has Abramovich right where he wants him. RA's skating on thin ice with the Chelsea fans after sacking RDM and hiring Benitez. I reckon JM thinks as long as he keeps saying "we won't win anything without a striker" Abramovich won't dare sack him again until he gets the cash he wants, and even then will still be safe as long as the fans are queueing up to get balls deep in him.

 

True that.

 

That Rooney fella doesn't half throw himself about. He needs to learn to stay on his feet.

 

Where's Matth with his "Rooney dived" thread

 

Lot of bored Scousers midweek these days

 

Nicely done, we should be busier next season.

 

. Unless United win CL!

 

Will Chelsea get a similar ban as to what Barca have got?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26847853


About time someone stopped them from cheating and doing numerous dodgy loans all over the place

 

The way things are going it's Chelsea who need to be worried about that, not Liverpool.

Tit.

 

We have been accused (note the key word ACCUSED, not proven) of encouraging Vitesse to avoid playing in the Champions League. If this were true, what benefit would there be for Chelsea? Vitesse and Chelsea do not share the same ownership.

Also what exactly is dodgy about these loans, and where have we cheated?? I hope you have a viable answer and don't just think so simply because of the number of players loaned out.

And what on earth does it have to do with what Barca have done?

What a ****ing car crash of a post.

 

Yet you stopped to rubber neck by replying

You have a squad out on loan ffs

" Uefa rules say two clubs under the same ownership cannot play in the same competition.

The Dutch Football Federation has contacted Vitesse to seek further information and will also look into the ownership of the side. "

So if The Dutch Football Federation want clarity where is your proof that they dont share the same ownership?

 

I see Barcelona have been banned from signing players, is it to do with the Neymar signing ?

 

So what? Say something stupid and I will call you out on it. Sorry to burst your bubble but having a 'squad out on loan' is not cheating nor is it dodgy. We also only have 4 players out on loan to Vitesse - the team in question ! Why would the dutch football federation be investigating loans we have in Spain, Belgium etc etc? We are not being investigated due to the number of players loaned out, it's becuase we've apparently discouraged them from winning the league.

The Dutch FF want clarity on the association between their owner and ours to try and piece this accusation against us together. You are linking the number of loans with this accusation when it has zilch to do with it.

I had a problem with your post because you clearly thought we'd been cheating in the past based on your opinion that having a 'squad out on loan' is somehow dodgy, or cheating. You then jumped at the fact we've been accused of something based on the relation of these loans and have somehow compared it to what Barca have done. I'll ask you again - what does us apparently discouraging a club to win their league have to do with what Barca did?

 

I personally think having a squad out on loan, buying all the best young players you dont need, buying senior players to stop other teams having them is not a very level playing field

I know the loans have nthing to do with this investigation, I was just making a comment


So why would you discourage them from winning the league?

Yeah nothing dodgy at all about Abramavich mate you keep telling yourself that


So you havent burst my bubble fella, tone the condescending tone down as well or I'll just ignore you. You arent some ****ing higher being so wind it in

This isnt going to go anywhere as I think you operate unfairly and you will never agree so we'll leave it there

 

Even if Abramovich owned both clubs (and there's no evidence he does) it's not against the rules to do so, so why would Chelsea get a transfer embargo?

#clutchingatbitterstraws

 

Are you? You should stop fella