I know mate but he`s getting more difficult to defend. imo he was given the information, printed it, tweeted, removed the tweet to cover his tracks and failed. He dropped himself right in it with his use of words. `heard` `will play` There`s no room for misinterpretation. If he`s betrayed a trust you really don`t want him as a friend. Careful what you say mate. Obviously has no scruples where £££ are concerned.
How ****ing childish and petty are The Sun today man. We are no longer known as SUNDERLAND, we are now DERLAND according to The Sun.
Because The Sun are banned from Sunderland, they are trying to be funny and are printing our name as DERLAND.
He needs to boil the heed of whoever leaked the info. Might not be a player but he needs to find out. Serious betrayal imo.
Just don't buy the **** paper then this childish response won't make any difference to you. It's not as if there aren't other papers who will more than adequately offer what the sun now can't. They lose, not us. If you're so attached to this paper you don't want to get your football news anywhere else, I'm very sorry.
1. Like I said, big deal. 2. Not for sure, no. BUT 99% certain. 3. The phrase 'Clutching at straws' springs to mind!
Big deal? You lot ban the newspapers for farting in the press box . We've banned them for a genuine reason. You may want to relay your sentiments to your owner who must ban a paper a week please log in to view this image
That is absolute nonsense and you know it! Neither you, nor anyone else outside of the Liverpool camp can say whether this information was seen and acted upon. The point is that someone, from Sunderland, tried to give Liverpool an advantage. That action, from anyone at any club, trying to help the opposition, whichever team you support, is totally unnacceptable. I hope they find out who it is, name and shame and show them the door. If it`s a player, they will never be trusted at another club. If it`s a member of staff I suggest they move as far away as possible.
