http://www.flickr.com/photos/47985911@N00/7443993946/in/pool-1816589@N22 No mascots, no face paint, no turd on the mike booming out banalities, no animal name gimmicks....the football was enough ....for real fans.
Some right arrogant ****s on here think they have the authority to tell others what to do. **** off. Would i wear face paint etc? No. But if some want to do that good luck to em. If the club shop had 20.000 people like me it would close as i dont buy anything.
except, it's in black and white.. i'd hate to be at the kc now watching the match in black and white... face paint sucks though
Despite me following Mike so he could elaborate on his claim via DM, he is unwilling to do so. He did DM me to say he was impressed with the campaign and respected me as a City fan(I did likewise, I see him at most games) he will not retract what he said, or say who he's talking about. Though he did offer to buy me a pint at Stoke.
Interesting, in a curious not critical way. When I was commenting on the 3rd option weakening the yes vote more than the no vote it was on the basis I couldn't see a lot of people selecting "don't care" that would select "no" in a straight Yes/No vote. Based on previous discussions on the name change thread you were one of the few I thought would have gone "DC" as even though you'd said you preferred the current name you'd said you were going either way, so that option seemed closest to your position. Did I miss a change in your position in the last few weeks, or has the ridiculous wording of the survey (amongst other PR cock-ups) made it so that the "don't care" option can't even attract the votes of the ones who actually don't care and they feel it's better to commit one way or another? It would be a bit worrying for the yes side if the conduct of those involved had actually made people who weren't bothered risk all the (imaginary) consequences just out of principle because they didn't want to be seen to approve of how things had been done.
Good for him, not everyone crumbles at the slightest request for information that they want to protect. CTWD could learn something from that. The onus should be on the person(s) who have the guilty secret to come out, not for someone else to out them. Do we expect honesty and integrity from them? Hell no.
On the CTWD website theres a picture of two blokes in tiger onesie's. One of em's a bloke in his 50's....... Just saying like...
Exactly. FA: Welcome to... CTWD: OMG OK! HERE! THEY'LL DESTROY THE ALLAMS BUT HERE YOU GO!!! Please don't tell anyone we gave you them.
Exactly , i would never wear any of it , but is it really that bad ?? Families enjoying themselves at a football game ? No matter how crass it is to the cool cats who copy the Scousers dress code , what harm does it do to you that large groups of people go to enjoy a day out without gesturing all game at another bunch of fake 'ard-men in perfect safety that is premier league. This is the premier league afteral , we must be used to the carnival atmosphere , the media frenzy of a nothing comment/challenge and the ridiculous double standards . Bring back the Glory days coz at least the city faithful will now be too old to run from West Ham and Leicester .
I always said if asked to vote yes for HULL CITY or HULL TIGERS I would have to vote HULL CITY. even though I wasn't that bothered . This vote to me is about the name change. Question c should not have been added imo. So I ignored question c The vote should have been yes or no to the name change . I ignored everything else that was said and voted how I always would have IF asked. I don't know anyone who prefers HULL TIGERS to HULL CITY .
