You didn't but O.K. I can't remember Adrian having a decent shot to save (he tipped a hit and hope from Huddlestone over but that's about it). You're more than welcome to use the phrase "played them off the park" but in the real world it's only really used when teams actually win (convincingly).
I can't actually believe you've tried to make an argument and abuse me out of something this petty. Something wrong? Just so you know, because clearly you've got issues, I shan't be replying. Go have your pointless hissy fit by yourself. Bye!
Comfortable in terms of dealing with you. They should have made the scoreline more comfortable but they didn't because they didn't play well enough to capitalise on 10 men. They were sluggish in midfield and wasted the ball countless times, but in terms of dealing with Hull's threats, they were comfortable.
Agree to an extent. We dominated but we didn't look particularly dangerous in their box. I think the ref had a lot to do with that though. A lot seemed to go against us when it might have mattered.
i honestly envisage you and your 'andy' like this with your laptops perched on the side please log in to view this image
Ok, just to clarify. I had no idea your point was a generalisation... you quoted me and essentually told me to **** off... and yeah, then told me to jump off a bridge. At least my response was funny vitriol...
You dominated in the midfield but didn't do anything to trouble West Ham. I actually thought that (penalty aside, although the linesman made the call) that the referee had a very even game and was generally unnoticed.
West Ham played a poor game but still did more with the ball (understandable against 10 men). Hull had more of the ball but had no urgency and looked lost up front. (Jelavic and Long were poor but they were fed scraps at best). Not even slightly.
