Circa you could have done a poll when AA sacked NB. 1. Do you think the club would be best served retaining the services of NB? 2. Do you think AA is now showing his true colours in acting akin to a drug lord & as such the club would be in a more favourable position if we got rid of this cancer ASAP?
If it pushes AA into presenting a simple 'Yes - No' question in his benighted (and tardy) poll, how can that be a bad thing? Or are you biased?
Bullshit as always from you. Allam clearly wants to scare people into voting for the name change. This is why he keeps insisting that a no vote means he's on his way. The two questions would avoid this, it allows people to vote on the name change and prove once and for all that we're a majority, without fear of him taking it the wrong way, as he's explicitly threatened to do. Only a total **** with a jealousy fuelled hatred of CTWD could oppose this statement.
In a time when our club has become a nationwide source of derision thanks to their stance, it'd be awful if someone said something naughty about them wouldn't it?
It's hilarious to see all the sheep all herded up by OriginalShepardman. They don't see it do they. They don't actually realise that CTWD is guilty of doing exactly what AA has done. BIASED ****S.
Is that really all you ****ing care about? What your plastic united and chelsea friends may or may not say about our club? "My little friends my take the piss waaaaahhh" Bad Assem! Bad boy!
You think I'm angry? I'm having fun at your expense boy. It's the little pleasures I get from coming on here now (since this forum has turned into a dictatorship) and making you BITE at everything.
