It's a bit of banter mate. I'm sure there are plenty of Arsenal only boards about if people don't want to get involved in inter-fan discussions. Little disappointed that you just put the blame (and threats) on to Chelsea fans to be honest. You only have to read back a couple of pages to see the frothing at the mouth nonsense some of your lot have embarked on.
Argh thank you! I was trying to remember their name but kept searching **** 88. Think I was getting confused with Kill Bill !
Only yanking your chain fella, of course we're all racists and BMP members. Only last week I was shagging a few of my work colleague's wives and wore my shin pads on dress down Friday.
this sums you lot up perfectly . The chav " look at what ive got " syndrome . I wont expect this to be comprehensible to you but , here goes. its NOT all about what you win , but HOW you win it. Chelsea will never quite get that , as they have BOUGHT all their EPL titles with cold hard cash . But they are happy , they have a full trophy cabinet . But as i have said before , i would rather Arsenal NEVER won another thing , than change to the Chelsea TEAM and FANS , and CLUB ethos . From the owner who sacks sucessfull managers , The manager who pi$$es over the record of every other manager , A classless lying tw@t . To the fans who see it all as a means to an end , and anything goes as long as they win stuff.
While I couldn't resist commenting on the Ozil discussion, I do try to note when someone or something IMO hits an all-time low, or new worst, even when it's against a rival. I've seen some horrible diving exhibitions (Suarez comes to mind, though he seems to have cut it out this year), but Robben's in particular and Bayern's in general was as bad as anything I've ever seen. Never really got started at all, then sank without a trace, thank you very much!
The truth has been spoken, no real football fans respect Chelsea's success, at least their success from 2005-onwards, everybody knows it was down to a fat paycheque, and nothing to do with actually building the club from the ground up with your own resources to achieve a consistent level of success. Chelski fans know this as well but they know they can't admit it, at the end of the day, success is quite easy when you have a billionare bankrolling you with unlimited funds.
I don't think you'll find many Chelsea fans care about your respect frankly. You keep telling yourself playing in neat triangles in the most expensive ground in England is better than winning trophies. The bitterness is very enjoyable though so do keep it up.
I respect chelsea as much as i respect combat 18. I dont recognise their success during the Roman era. Even if they win a major trophy the footballing world just yawns at their success. As one person said no true lover of football could support Chelsea FC.
can you explain the "over 100 years of history" stat. when did you first win the league, when did you then next win the league or another major trophy. before you slag arsenal off you have to remember that we have actually been winning league titles for a very long time, and we do actually have a 100 years worth of history. where were you when Ken Bates was in charger - winning **** all. where will chelsea be without russian mafia money - no ****ing where. we have kept competitive for last decade without resulting to sell our soul and bankrupting ourselves, and we can now look to the future with a strong financial base resulting from true profits that have been earned. chelsea don't make enough money to run their club [record losses most years] so lets hope you go the way of Leeds once your gangster owner loses interest [his first passion is ice hockey]. if chelsea fans were more humble about how they have achieved their latest wins then neutral fans might actually like them, but as you are as arrogant as your current manager and as cultish as your captain, then it will never happen. chelski can go play psg and monaco and other russian mafia/oil magnates playthings, and leave football to the purists. why do neutral fans like arsenal ? because we play attractive football, and we try to play the right way, and we try to play with the right ethos. remember when we asked for a game to be replayed because we won and Wenger wasn't happy about how we won it. would never ever so Jose doing the same. chelsea have no class just lots of cash. when the cash has gone then what have you got. we have always had class and we always will have class. now **** off back to your own forum.
For fans that are well known for booing and slagging off their own players, board and manager, you do get very sensitive at anyone else pointing out any of your failings. Arsenal like pretty much any club has its faults as does my club. Just don't pretend you have any moral high ground. Frankly that last post was an embarrassing rant.
please give examples of well known for booing and slagging off their own players, board and manager, - or is that more WUM ****e. i can say what i like about my team on my teams forum. if you don't like it then don't bother reading our forum. you didn't answer the question about when did you win the league, etc. if you intend to return with more WUM ****e then don't bother.
Last time you booed was united at home, time before that was the Liverpool game a few days before. That's just recently!! We won the title in 55. But how is that relevant to my name. History is not the same as trophies won unless your a Liverpool fan Don't get so worked up
so 1955 and then when. your name says a 100 years of history - history of what then. the point i am trying to make is that teams go through periods of winning and not winning. our period of winning is about to return. not worked up. dislike wums
What's with everyone claiming a conspiracy against Ozil? He's been totally **** for months now, he deserves the criticism he gets, any other player would get destroyed if they were playing this badly after costing £42 million. Rosicky currently deserves to start over Ozil.
there was no rant , it was a statement of fact , and of course your not bothered . Thats the point. Tool .
