Just cos he turns up 1 and a half times a year (the twat), overall he is still piss poor. If he was any good, he'd have sold for £20million, as that's about the same amount of times Jordan turned up last season
Probably 'cos it's quite embarrassing for you. I would try to ignore it too if I were in your shoes. Ignorance is bliss eh?
Doesn't embarrass me at all actually. You had a few glory years a few years back, i'm aware of this, as i was around. I still don't give 2 ****e's, and i still think Shola is ****. Hope this clears this up
But if he's 'not as **** as Sunderland', how did we finish above you for the 3rd year in a row when he plays for you? You walked into that factual statement, now trott on.
Yet another skunk newbie that will end up with more posts here than on the Mugs board. HOw come they send us all their apprentice trolls? Unless he has come over to the Sunderland board to find some intelligent conversation.
Embarrassing??? Not as embarrassing as finishing below your supposed "smaller" neighbour. Three years running and counting.
Shola has played 16 times in europe and scored 7 goals, we have played 4 time and scored 5 goals, we have a better goals to games ratio (anyone can make things look better.worse if they want) IE i dont care if shola has scored more than us.
Finishing above us would only make a difference were you to qualify for Europe at our expense, gloating about it is pathetic because you've achieved **** all.
Yes,but you were newly promoted after a ten year stint including Champions League football, we had yo-yoed for years, and the investment was to stabilise the club in the top league, which we have. Dress it any way you like, you said Shola is better than Sunderland, so on the basis of fact, that would mean you'd finish above us. You didn't, so you were wrong, end of.
