Outrageous

It was The Brits wot sunk The Titanic.

 

I've not seen 12 years a slave, yet.

In a word, is it better than Amistad?

 

Not in my humble opinion, and also I believe the only reason Amistad never won best movie is because Speileberg directed it. He was not popular with the Oscars commitee at that time.

 

It's not as good as Despicable Me II

 

Here he comes with the anti-jew bile.

 

Correct, as seen by nominations to wins for The Colour Purple.

 

And no nomination for best Director for Saving Private Ryan

 

Everyone I know who's watched 12 Years A Slave say it's brilliant. Stick to ****ey WW2 war movies Dev.

 

Have you seen it?

 

So anything to do with darkies is an automatic winner.

Surely that is racist.

 

Everyone know the only sure-fire way to win an Oscar for acting is to play a gay black disabled slave with a learning disability. Preferably while gaining/losing a stupid amount of weight and doing an accent that's not your own.

 

That was a pish film yet again highlighting that America wins everything on it's own. ****in americans lap it up, idiots.

 

11 nominations, no wins. How is that an automatic winner?

 

It needed saying.

Brave Venom, brave.

But absolutely correct.

 

Really.

Had I bothered looking it up I would have seen that but I didn't because quite frankly I couldn't give a monkeys.

 

I only know because I read it in the paper over the weekend.

 

It was that ****e, it should not have received any nominations.

"Quick, play the darkie card"

 

To be honest I quite like not doing any research. Always causes consternation on here.

 

Not yet.

Apparently the movie doesn't show anywhere near the brutality that was in the book. It was watered down.

 

He didn't win one himself but I believe the original version of the Jazz Singer did win one (not the Neil Diamond re-make)

please log in to view this image