Two articles said monday and two articles said thursday but l'm pretty sure the monday one is right .Don't worry about me pagan , Im fine physically at 62 , mentally , not so much lol
Michu was one of the players who complained about laudrup He is very happy he is gone thank you very much just like all the players are
Where are you getting this nonsense from or is it that you are making things up...he has gone ,its over as far as the players are concerned and now its all about what compo he gets...It wont be anywhere near what he thinks in a million years..
Knowing the people at the liberty then that is good enough for me...you will be surprised at what i hear Its well known that players were often at jinx's door complaining... Do you lot think that jinx has formed a conspiracy against laudrup or what.? Do you honestly believe that all the reports about not turning up for training and going off for days on end doing personal things instead of being at the club trying to stop our downward fall which he is very well paid to do and do you honestly believe that jinx and the board have sacked laudrup for no good reason?? ....What part is good for you, because where i stand he has been a waste of his time and our time being here, Anyone can do what he has done and make us into a poor and very easily beatable side and it was showing at the liberty that the fans were not happy...Is that what you want for us, ? ....Do you want us to go down because that is where we were heading fast......We may still go down but at least now we are putting up a fight....
Knowing bartenders, security guards and ticket salesmen doesn't legitimize your ravings. Oh, you might know the fish and chips salesman too...
Monk was quoted in the papers, he had told then he wasn't going. Roofs articles provided no quotes just speculative nonsense. Monk said he wasn't going, he didn't go.
You could listen to what Monk said yourself on this subject. The question comes up at 5:29 in the video. [video=youtube_share;CYg0Wc4nzMA]http://youtu.be/CYg0Wc4nzMA[/video]
I've heard from a number of separate sources that Michu was pretty brassed off at: a) Laudrup's dismissal and b) the way it was done. I will stress that these sources do not lay claim to any privileged info but, tellingly, they all seem to be in agreement about it. Makes me wonder therefore if he's not that fussed to rush back from his injury. It might also indicate that he wants out at the end of the season. It's conjecture of course but it is a matter of record that Michu was one of those who specifically came to the club because Michael Laudrup was here.
And he should be equally grateful of the opportunity the club gave him to become a top player in the PL.
Just like we showed how grateful we were to ML in what was our highest ever finish, our first piece of meaningful silverware and getting us into Europe, so grateful we were that we didn't even allow him to see out the tie against Napoli, a tie we would never have got had it not been for ML. Is that the same gratefulness that Michu should show us? I mean it can't have been because we didn't trust ML to win any of the games, after all, Monk only won one of them right?