I like this

Boisterous?
Getting pissed and setting of flares
Breaking seats
Abusing police officers and other fans who ask them to move to the seats they have tickets for?

You know what - I am better than them. And gladly so

 

When you get down to it Mindy the difference between us is;

Mindy = Reactionary Fudwit

Venom = Progressive Genius.

 

I'm better than them, the kilnkers on my hairy arse are better than these ****s

 

I am not the defence lawyer for every fan that misbehaves...do you think all bad aspects of the Celtic support are the fault of the GB or those that sing RoH?

 

Celtic FC is all about respect. Being open and welcoming to anyone

The trouble makers that have got the GB in trouble have no respect for themselves let alone fellow fans or the police or the property they destroy at grounds they visit

I've supported Celtic many years and watched them all over the world. Wherever we have gone in times gone by if people get drunk and step out of line they got quickly put back in line by fellow fans

The GB attract a large following of neds. The GB's philosphy seems to be one that even if the neds cause trouble they wont tell them they are being outof line or wont help the police or the club identify trouble makers. The group grows and the ordinary fan who previously helped keep order can no longer cuz rather than being confronted by a couple of ****s are confronted by hundreds.

And Celtics reputation worsens, Amsterdam, staduims in scotland having seats broken, flares etc. These are done behind the GB banner even if not GB members

This is how I view the GB. They themselves are not the cause - but they arent helping to be the solution to this growing problem either

So **** them

They are helping to ruin watching Celtic while claiming to improve the experience

 

Misbehave = Break the ****ing law.

 

I'm sure they say something about grandiose self image too

 

And when its not breaking a ****ing law - create one

 

Why don't the "well behaved fans" sing those songs instead?

 

Its not that black and white though is it

They were breaking the law before.

They could have been done for general disorder. If the fans did some of the things they do at the stadiums in a pub or at a concert or in a city centre they could be arrested also. The fans who do what they do at the stadium themselves probably accept that if they did what they are doing in a city centre they could be lifted. But for some reason they got it into their heads that at the football anything goes. Its all good fun etc.

But its not

They were asked to stop and didnt

The law (for all its faults - and there are many) came about to try and make it easier to arrest people to try and teach the lesson that you cannot get away with it at the football.

Its there because these people are too stupid to know you cant behave in that way so have to be told

 

They were already breaking two laws before this law was brought in.

 

You should just stop right now. Seriously.

 

The GB were not involved in Amsterdam, did not break seats and do not have a member on remand for 6 weeks for singing a song

The GB are being hung out to dry by Celtic so that people like you can associate them with any trouble Celtic fans cause

On your many travels, how outraged were you with Celtic fans when they broke 1200 seats at Kilmarnock when we won the league....or didn't you care?

 

Have you read the Celtic FC Mission statement?

 

Maybe the prosecution should concentrate on these two laws instead and maybe get some convictions

 

If its called a mission statement, I doubt it

 

Maybe you should, maybe you'll learn something about the club you profess to support.

 

Are you suggesting there have been NO convictions under this legislation?

 

Recently 3 cases have been thrown out of court

One conviction after prosecution appealed I know of and the boy on remand for 6 weeks

 

So why are you suggesting they should concentrate on Breach of the Peace or the Terrorism Act to get convictions when they have already had at least one conviction which came after 3 High Court Judges ruled on it and agreed that it was valid?