Win dedicated to Laudrup

Breezy Your a nuisance.

If you can't start saying clever things then don't post.

I can't understand half you write, actually you might have written something clever in that case, however the half I can read is total
bo----ll------cks

 

He is clueless, always has been, last time he got sent packing with his tail between his legs for his bitching, I suspect he's on the same road again!...........

 

You've spent a lifetime on here bitching and belittling our players phil , everyone gets a turn depending on how they play a particular team , a fairweatherfan at best .

 

He is entitled to whatever he is entitled to. I wouldn't settle for anything other than 100% of that - not a penny more, but certainly not a penny less.

 

At least he doesn't post negative rumours based on none other than SportsDirect articles.

Wilfried #10 dislikes the article and will not be shopping at SportsDirect.

 

Then f*ck him. And that would be my final opinion.

 

Seabreeze_11 just like the weekend whatever happens from now until the end of the season Garry Monk and HIS team are responsible for, if it's good or bad.

At least he'd never sue SCFC and you can mark that down anywhere.

 

Ya , your one of those real grateful guys with the short memory , sucks to be you.

 

Laudrup signed the player that featured in every goal in that second half ... Pablo. He was the player that made the difference.

Also, much hasn't been written about it, but Vorm's save off Whittingham in the first half was immense. Tremble probably wouldn't have made that save ... and it would have been a different game entirely if that shot had gone in and it was curling inside that near post.

 

I can imagine it now, Kieran one day in the future gets made redundant, and only accepts half of what he is entitled too lol

 

Yeah Pablo's a quality player. In my opinion signing players was Michael Laudrup's best quality.

He also signed your boy 'Tremble' (A decent #2)

 

You have always been a **** stirrer on here Breezy, it's got you into hot water more than once, you last little tantrum was aimed at our mods, seems you have learnt nothing, I'm sure you'll get what's coming you way, your too dense to know any better!...............

 

That was Rodgers mate. As "Tremble" was purchased in 2011, ML did not join Swansea until 2012

 

Yeah because Michael Laudrup is skint isn't he? Or is he? Well he shouldn't be.

No I certainly would NOT sue SCFC especially if I was moving on to a top job elsewhere.

But my opinions are based on being a supporter on SCFC only.

 

As they say in America, my bad.

 

Are you behind Garry Monk swanselona?

If we don't beat Stoke then let's blame Brendan Rodgers then.

 

Exactly, your opinion on the matter is clouded by your love of the club, a club that ML does not love in the same light, SCFC were his employers, so there is no affection in regards to the way we look at our club, so he has every right to sue the club if they are going about it in the wrong manner, and he would get no stick from me because of it.

Whether he is rich or not, has no bearing, the club is rich too, in fact richer than ML no doubt, so they should in the same manner, just pay up, right?

 

I am 100% behind Garry Monk, e is the man in charge. Have never been less than 100% behind him

 

We must all be thankful then,that your "opinion" doesn't amount to a hill of beans in the real World.

Yankee is correct in his assessment,viz,"he,(Laudrup),is entitled to whatever he is entitled to".

 

Seabreeze_11 did they ever make it big in America?

[video=youtube;eQBjQs07wbw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQBjQs07wbw[/video]

Only kidding, I liked Roberto.