Yeovil Town vs Leeds United Match Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I used to wind people up but never did I move from thread to thread starting the same arguments making the leeds forum a worse place for people. I'm in a position now to try help this forum grow and I'm trying to do that mate so apologies for the hypocrisy but it is needed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You and boab used to snipe at each other so much, disrupting every thread on the Leeds forum, that you had to have your own thread started, entitled the 'kissa and boab beef thread'

Seems you have a very selective memory in order to take the moral high ground
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chippy / Glory
I'm not taking no moral high ground just trying to improve things thats all, the arguments with me n boab where light hearted and never abusive like some of the things posted in recent days, no lets drop this cos its not going anywhere, I know I'm a troll and still like to wind up but try not to get personal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm not taking no moral high ground just trying to improve things thats all, the arguments with me n boab where light hearted and never abusive like some of the things posted in recent days, no lets drop this cos its not going anywhere, I know I'm a troll and still like to wind up but try not to get personal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you seriously saying that a collective bollockng was in appropriate for what happened over recent days, rather than a less lazy option of dealing with one person who kicked it off by being antagonistic and downright vindictive against at least two who didn't do anything to deserve it?
 
It wasn't a collective bollocking it was collective encouragement to use the ignore function.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It wasn't a collective bollocking it was collective encouragement to use the ignore function.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was an easy option. Whatever you decide, sometimes you have to point the finger at the problem. If it's me, WJ, OLOF or someone else as a mod IMO you should have dealt with it instead of doing what you did. Instead of doing nothing you should have ignored it.
 
It wasn't a collective bollocking it was collective encouragement to use the ignore function.
This is what I don't understand?? Why was the same not said about Blueme and Clive Time? This is what pisses me off, one person constantly misbehaves and rather than them have a quiet word in the ear to behave a sweeping brush is made tarnishing those that defend themselves.

There are some strong characters on here, I would bet £1000 on there being a few posters who change their mind about posting on this forum for fear of having their post picked to pieces and I will name him if you're too worried to, Sheldon, Elmo or whatever name his name is now. NO I do not want him banned but he needs to be told his actions on here are over stepping the mark.
 
It was an easy option. Whatever you decide, sometimes you have to point the finger at the problem. If it's me, WJ, OLOF or someone else as a mod IMO you should have dealt with it instead of doing what you did. Instead of doing nothing you should have ignored it.


Point taken Glory, we have 3 mods here and things are done as a collective and I stand by the decision, people have a problem with each other should use the ignore function.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Micheal-The-Messiah-Brown have you got me on your ignore function ;) <ok>

This is what I don't understand?? Why was the same not said about Blueme and Clive Time? This is what pisses me off, one person constantly misbehaves and rather than them have a quiet word in the ear to behave a sweeping brush is made tarnishing those that defend themselves.

There are some strong characters on here, I would bet £1000 on there being a few posters who change their mind about posting on this forum for fear of having their post picked to pieces and I will name him if you're too worried to, Sheldon, Elmo or whatever name his name is now. NO I do not want him banned but he needs to be told his actions on here are over stepping the mark.
 
This is what I don't understand?? Why was the same not said about Blueme and Clive Time? This is what pisses me off, one person constantly misbehaves and rather than them have a quiet word in the ear to behave a sweeping brush is made tarnishing those that defend themselves.



There are some strong characters on here, I would bet £1000 on there being a few posters who change their mind about posting on this forum for fear of having their post picked to pieces and I will name him if you're too worried to, Sheldon, Elmo or whatever name his name is now. NO I do not want him banned but he needs to be told his actions on here are over stepping the mark.

Quiet words will be had when the team feel its needed pal first steps as mods is to encourage the ignore feature :)

I haven't got you blocked....yet ;)





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I don't know how to use the ignore function, nor do I know what happens when I do. Does it mean that if some dick is abusing me, then everyone but me can see him run riot & tarnish my reputation?